This Might Suck To Hear, But If You're A People Pleaser That Is Motivated By Praise And Avoids Disagreements,

Farewell online privacy

Went in looking for RWRB placement found kimchqy as the only thai paring in the top 100. Thank you all for your amazing hardworking hands and brains :)

We’re at number 16!!! the fact that the others are mostly series or has more than one movie/book/etc as content but rwrb still managed to be on this list lmao someone tell cmq and matthew that we are this parched and starving 😭

Republican deregulation is a bullshit solution in search of a problem.

Regulations were put there for a reason.

Republicans want to pretend the original problem never existed. It's perverse.

Ex: Deregulation of media ownership has created a massive problem. Had we kept ownership regulations, we would have diverse opinions and exceptional local news.

a bishop literally asked trump to have mercy because we are all human beings and conservatives are acting like she put a pistol to his head

where does that fucker get the time for all that. it has to be dark magic at this point, right?

My personal theory about why queer people have a reputation for being weird and loud is that once you figure out that being yourself even in the most mundane and semi-normative way will piss people off you may as well throw off every trace of normative behavior and sensibility you don’t want because if you’re going to be hated anyways you might as well have fun with it

35. Still reading, it is my comfort blanket and now restarting translating 💕

Reblog if you’re over 20 and still read/write fan fiction.

I’m curious!

never, ever, stop fighting back

This list includes doctors in the United States, Australia, Canada, and Europe!

Even if you're not the target demographic, please share for any of your friends who may be.

And if you or someone you know would like to be added to the list, there's a place for that!

Listen, if a Bad President can come in and take away our rights and we're dependent on a Good President replacing them in four years to give us back our rights, then we do not have any rights.

If politicians can take or distribute them, then they're not "inalienable" and they're not "rights."

We don't have inalienable rights we have conditional privileges, divvied out according to the whims of whoever currently holds the reins.

And if we want to have actual rights, then we must build a system in which no one has the power to take them away to begin with.