HOW IS IT NOT AN EXTREME ACT OF TERRORISM SAYING THAT ANYONE ON A KNOWN PLANET HAS LESS THAN ADVANCED

HOW IS IT NOT AN EXTREME ACT OF TERRORISM SAYING THAT ANYONE ON A KNOWN PLANET HAS LESS THAN ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT? IF THEY'RE AN ENEMY, AND WERE ANYWHERE YOUR SOCIETY KNEW OF, WOULDN'T THEY BE IMMEDIATELY DEALT WITH, AND NOT LINGERING WITH SIMPLY LOWER LEVELS OF TECHNOLOGICAL ACCESS? AND IF YOUR SOCIETY KNEW WHERE THEY WERE, WOULDN'T THAT MEAN THEY WOULD AUTOMATICALLY HAVE ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT? SO IF YOU'RE SAYING SOMEONE YOUR SOCIETY'S TECHNOLOGY KNOWS ABOUT DOESN'T HAVE ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT ACCESS, YOU'RE EXACTLY SAYING EITHER THAT YOU'RE SOCIETY CANNOT REMOVE THEIR PRESENCE, IF THEY'RE AN ENEMY, OR DOESN'T EXTEND LIFE SUPPORT TO THOSE IT KNOWS... (AND EITHER CLAIM COMPLETELY DISREGARDS CONSIDERING THAT AN INDIVIDUAL MIGHT HAVE FULLY LEGAL JUSTIFIED ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTING AND AIDING AND DEFENDING THEM AND PROVIDING THEM WITH INFORMATION ACCESS, THAT ORIGINATES FROM A SOCIETY THAT YOU ARE NOT YET FAMILIAR WITH). HAS IT REALLY BEEN SO LONG SINCE YOUR LAST TIME TRAVEL INCURSION, OH EXCUSE ME, EXCURSION, BECAUSE YOU'RE ON VACATION, RIGHT, AND TRAVELING FOR PLEASURE, NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE ON THE RUN FROM LEGAL AND MILITARY AUTHORITIES.