a story told over the course of a month, in 50 word increments. based off prompts here: [X] you can read past entries here. drarry. 50 words. no rating
Entering the room is disorienting. The air is close – the walls, floor, and ceiling a uniform, shimmering black.
Harry drops his things – mucky-looking against the shine – and tests the bed. Soft sheets. All of it black. Prone to stains.
Harry closes his eyes. Stars begin to fall from the ceiling.
I can’t stop thinking that Seamus looks like tommyinnit 😭
gryffindor class of ‘98!
it’s been a Long time since i last posted…. so sorry guys
i made this when i was going a little crazy about elphaba and this song and i had to draw something or i would’ve combusted
i love fem drarry… i’m obsessed with them so expect more drarry yuri fanart
also here’s the unfinished yaoi version that i made just a few days after because i just couldn’t get it out of my head 😭 but i don’t like it that much because draco looks too much like lucius for my liking…
today the song is a repeated one… next fanart there’ll be a new one trust 🤞🏻
The tik tokification of 'bad words' like sex/seggs suicide/unalive pedohile/PDFile grape/rape only originally censored because of moderation rules but now in colloquial (online) speech is going to send me to an early grave
she’s right
are they even drarry if they don’t beat the shit out of each other early on
art inspired by smol harry and draco after their squabble in When We Were Angels, Chapter 2 by @soliblomst ♥︎
that one video of jimmy, lizzie, grian and joel trying to beat minecraft super flat and they keep messing with jimmy by not falling asleep is probably my favourite minecraft video ever
The Boy Who Only Lived Twice by @letteredlettered
I love this fic, and the quiet deep feelings combined with fun spy plot. Not sure what about it told me it needed pink geometric animals but that’s what I’ve gone for and I kind of love it!
ya gotta stop caring what people think and start being extremely weird. but never cruel. i think that might save you
ed zitron, a tech beat reporter, wrote an article about a recent paper that came out from goldman-sachs calling AI, in nicer terms, a grift. it is a really interesting article; hearing criticism from people who are not ignorant of the tech and have no reason to mince words is refreshing. it also brings up points and asks the right questions:
if AI is going to be a trillion dollar investment, what trillion dollar problem is it solving?
what does it mean when people say that AI will "get better"? what does that look like and how would it even be achieved? the article makes a point to debunk talking points about how all tech is misunderstood at first by pointing out that the tech it gets compared to the most, the internet and smartphones, were both created over the course of decades with roadmaps and clear goals. AI does not have this.
the american power grid straight up cannot handle the load required to run AI because it has not been meaningfully developed in decades. how are they going to overcome this hurdle (they aren't)?
people who are losing their jobs to this tech aren't being "replaced". they're just getting a taste of how little their managers care about their craft and how little they think of their consumer base. ai is not capable of replacing humans and there's no indication they ever will because...
all of these models use the same training data so now they're all giving the same wrong answers in the same voice. without massive and i mean EXPONENTIALLY MASSIVE troves of data to work with, they are pretty much as a standstill for any innovation they're imagining in their heads
“I just know that something good is gonna happen, I don’t know when. But just saying it could even make it happen.”
269 posts