Colourfulgalaxyexplorer-blog - Astrophysics Explorer

More Posts from Colourfulgalaxyexplorer-blog and Others

Dark Matter Is A Hypothetical Kind Of Matter That Cannot Be Seen With Telescopes But Would Account For
Dark Matter Is A Hypothetical Kind Of Matter That Cannot Be Seen With Telescopes But Would Account For

Dark matter is a hypothetical kind of matter that cannot be seen with telescopes but would account for most of the matter in the universe. The existence and properties of dark matter are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, on radiation, and on the large-scale structure of the universe. Dark matter has not been detected directly, making it one of the greatest mysteries in modern astrophysics.

Dark matter neither emits nor absorbs light or any other electromagnetic radiation at any significant level. According to the Planck mission team, and based on the standard model of cosmology, the total mass–energy of the known universe contains 4.9% ordinary matter, 26.8% dark matter and 68.3% dark energy.[2][3] Thus, dark matter is estimated to constitute 84.5% [note 1] of the total matter in the universe, while dark energy plus dark matter constitute 95.1% of the total mass–energy content of the universe.[4][5][6]

A Nebula (Latin For "cloud";[2] Pl. Nebulae, Nebulæ, Or Nebulas) Is An Interstellar Cloud Of Dust, Hydrogen,
A Nebula (Latin For "cloud";[2] Pl. Nebulae, Nebulæ, Or Nebulas) Is An Interstellar Cloud Of Dust, Hydrogen,

A nebula (Latin for "cloud";[2] pl. nebulae, nebulæ, or nebulas) is an interstellar cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases. Originally, nebula was a name for any diffuse astronomical object, including galaxies beyond the Milky Way. The Andromeda Galaxy, for instance, was referred to as the Andromeda Nebula (and spiral galaxies in general as "spiral nebulae") before the true nature of galaxies was confirmed in the early 20th century by Vesto Slipher, Edwin Hubble and others.

Most nebulae are of vast size, even hundreds of light years in diameter.[3] Although denser than the space surrounding them, most nebulae are far less dense than any vacuum created in an Earthen environment - a nebular cloud the size of the Earth would have a total mass of only a few kilograms. Nebulae are often star-forming regions, such as in the "Pillars of Creation" in the Eagle Nebula. In these regions the formations of gas, dust, and other materials "clump" together to form larger masses, which attract further matter, and eventually will become massive enough to form stars. The remaining materials are then believed to form planets and other planetary system objects.

Buzz Aldrin Inside The Gemini 12 Spacecraft, November 13, 1966.

Buzz Aldrin inside the Gemini 12 spacecraft, November 13, 1966.

(NASA/University of Arizona)

How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?
How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?
How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?
How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?
How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?
How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?

How Close Are We To Nuclear Fusion?

“Naysayers love to claim that nuclear fusion is always decades away — and always will be — but the reality is we’ve moved ever closer to the breakeven point and solved a large number of technical challenges over the past twenty years. Nuclear fusion, if we ever achieve it on a large scale, will usher in a new era for humanity: one where energy conservation is a thing of the past, as the fuel for our heart’s desires will literally be without limits.”

The ultimate dream when it comes to clean, green, safe, abundant energy is nuclear fusion. The same process that powers the core of the Sun could also power everything on Earth millions of times over, if only we could figure out how to reach that breakeven point. Right now, we have three different candidates for doing so: inertial confinement, magnetic confinement, and magnetized target fusion. Recent advances have all three looking promising in various ways, making one wonder why we don’t spend more resources towards achieving the holy grail of energy.

A Wormhole, Or Einstein-Rosen Bridge, Is A Hypothetical Topological Feature That Would Fundamentally
A Wormhole, Or Einstein-Rosen Bridge, Is A Hypothetical Topological Feature That Would Fundamentally

A wormhole, or Einstein-Rosen Bridge, is a hypothetical topological feature that would fundamentally be a shortcut connecting two separate points in spacetime that could connect extremely far distances such as a billion light years or more, short distances, such as a few feet, different universes, and in theory, different points in time. A wormhole is much like a tunnel with two ends, each in separate points in spacetime.

For a simplified notion of a wormhole, space can be visualized as a two-dimensional (2D) surface. In this case, a wormhole would appear as a hole in that surface, lead into a 3D tube (the inside surface of a cylinder), then re-emerge at another location on the 2D surface with a hole similar to the entrance. An actual wormhole would be analogous to this, but with the spatial dimensions raised by one. For example, instead of circular holes on a 2D plane, the entry and exit points could be visualized as spheres in 3D space.

Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?
Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?

Ask Ethan #103: Have We Solved The Black Hole Information Paradox?

“How is Hawking’s theory of black holes storing information on the shell of an event horizon different than what Susskind said decades ago about black holes storing information on the shell of an event horizon? Did Hawking just pull a Steve Jobs and proclaim something new that Android figured out years before? Or is this actually new stuff?”

Stephen Hawking is claiming that the black hole information paradox has now been resolved, with the information encoded on the event horizon and then onto the outgoing radiation via a new mechanism that he’ll detail in a paper due out next month, along with collaborators Malcom Perry and Andrew Strominger. Only, that’s not really what’s happening here. While he does have a new idea and there is a paper coming out, its contents do not solve the information paradox, but merely provide a hypothesis as to how it may be solved in the future.

Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?
Throwback Thursday: Do You Really Love Science?

Throwback Thursday: Do you really love science?

“That’s okay, because you’re a scientist! Your old theory — or way of making sense of the world — now gets revised, and replaced with a new one that’s even better at describing the full suite of phenomena you’re aware of.”

When you first venture out into the world, you’re armed, as a human being, with an incredible intelligence, but with no experience. All sorts of basic things must be learned, often the hard way: hot things will burn you, hot things that don’t look hot will also burn you, and that even very cold things will burn you, too. Figuring those things out – and the process by which you learn them – is science, in and of itself. But to move forward requires that we understand why, and that’s where scientific theories, leaps and even revolutions come into play. Don’t let bad science reporting take you away from what science is really all about: the knowledge and joy of figuring out how the world and Universe really works.

A Galaxy Cluster Or Cluster Of Galaxies Is A Structure That Consists Of Anywhere From Hundreds To Thousands

A galaxy cluster or cluster of galaxies is a structure that consists of anywhere from hundreds to thousands of galaxies bound together by gravity.[1] They are the largest known gravitationally bound structures in the universe and were the largest known structures in the universe until the 1980s when superclusters were discovered.[2] One of the key features of clusters is the intracluster medium or ICM. The ICM consists of heated gas between the galaxies and has a temperature on the order of 7-9 keV. Galaxy clusters should not be confused with star clusters such as open clusters, which are structures of stars within galaxies, as well as globular clusters, which typically orbit galaxies. Small aggregates of galaxies are referred to as groups of galaxies rather than clusters of galaxies. The groups and clusters can themselves cluster together to formsuperclusters.

A very interesting documentary about the Universe.

If you can dream it, you can do it

Walt Disney (1901- 1966)

colourfulgalaxyexplorer-blog - Astrophysics Explorer
Astrophysics Explorer

Exploring the Universe without limits

23 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags