My Blog Is About Nothing. I Reblod Random Tumblr Post I Find Myself Cracking A Smile At.

Huge TERF following you have, huh? Wonder why that is.

I assume you're referring to the results on this poll.

Respectfully, the way tumblr works is that when a post is reblogged, it ends up getting seen by people who do not follow the OP.

In the first day of that poll going live, the last option made up a very low percentage, around 1.5–2%. After circulating for 6 days, that percentage is obviously much higher. What that indicates to me is that the 2% is most likely more representative of people who saw the post directly from this blog, while the inflated number came after that 2% reblogged the post into their circles/TERFS who follow other rebloggers got hold of it.

TERFs in particular seem to get a lot of enjoyment out of reblogging/commenting on pro-trans and/or anti-terf posts, either to pose as the victim or to make fun of the posts. (Or both.) They love to hate. It's a game to them, and that's why it seems unusually weighted– they have more fun kicking a post like that around, as opposed to everyone else whose additions are less "interesting" comments (meaning less likely to spark further engagement) like "no I haven't" or "yeah once, ugh."

A large number of the non-terf votes are also likely from people who wouldn't want to reblog that poll anyway (for a multitude of reasons), which comparatively lessens the poll's reach among the people who think like them.

Regardless of the reason for the high percentage on that poll, I would hope that my track record would speak for me here. You can take a look through a variety of topics and posts that should more or less communicate my stance. As a reminder, I openly state that I modify the text of many submissions; this often involves changing polls to use more inclusive language, but also means that if I wanted to use less inclusive language, I could very easily do so.

Polls tagged #gender

Polls tagged #lgbtq | [category] Polls about LGBTQ stuff

Polls tagged #trans

Posts in which I speak (for more perspective on how I conduct myself and the values from which I approach this blog)

In particular I will draw your attention to phrases like "people with vaginas," "people who menstruate," "people with penises," and terms like LGBTQ and queer. These are terms I deliberately add to polls (when relevant) if they are not already phrased that way; and generally speaking, these are not terms/phrases that terfs use. Every time there's a poll using terms like these, there's a terf in the comments complaining about it. I block them when I see them. I don't catch everything– I'm not perfect– but I do what I reasonably can. We support trans people here.

Lord Stanley’s BINGO

Hello friends (and foes). @imperatorrrrr and I have created a 'yoffs BINGO for everyone's enjoyment.

Use this link to auto-generate a card.

Once you have generated a card, make sure you save it as it will generate a new card every time you click the link. Feel free to generate multiple cards! We have made almost all the items broad enough that you can check them off without having to watch the games (e.g. you can find it in the Game Summary, or online).

If you make posts, please tag us or '#2k24 nhl playoff bingo' so we can keep up with your progress!!!

Referring to where you live most of the time

If you see this post before the 16th, reblog it. Gotta share to get more votes.

If you see this post after the 16th, check the notes for a followup poll and reblog that version instead.

reminds me of YTer compaling that what? She can't be part of 4B if she is in hetero relationship? Or men who wants to be women and overall, it being exclusive. It requires a participant will NOT to bear children

4b is exclusive and never will be inclusive. It's in the nameeeeeee. Like Boy's Scouts.(I hate that I refer Shapiro here but it fits then it sits)

I LOVE the fact that korean radfems are only inclusive to women that follow 6B4T. A lot of women whine about how shitty men are and have experienced moid violence in their life own lives but still go back to their Nigel. We need feminist movements that only include women that put in the work for liberation!!

We need to recognise that gatekeeping is necessary for movements and groups in general to prosper. In order to gatekeep, members must meet criteria. If you don’t meet the criteria, you don’t get access into the group. If you don’t follow 6B4T/4B principles, then you don’t get access into the group. That’s fine. Everyone is not meant to be in the group. Everything is not for everyone.

When you recognise that most women have no problem with male supremacy and want to perpetuate it, but they don’t like being excluded, and they consider feminism a dating strategy to girlboss their relationships, their behaviour makes sense.

But those of us who are serious about female liberation need to understand that we will exclude the majority of the female population and we need to be okay with that. Most of us need to be okay with hurting those women’s feelings by keeping them out, because they are antithetical to the movement and want to sabotage it.

I think people misunderstand "x fell first, y fell harder " trope because it's not about like the one who fell harder loves the other person harder. It's just that the one who fell first falls in a graceful way, one step at the time, maybe gradually over a span of time. The one who fell harder smashes trough the air, there's blood everywhere, everything is fine-

"how's your writing?"

-"I am getting there honey."

throughout history it has been a man’s job to provi..

no, throughout history men have actively prevented the independence of women, they have actively prevented our mobility, rights to an education, and livable income. they’ve abused our reproductive capability and passed us around like properties, they’ve used religion to rationalize their hatred of us, and to put us in a place of subordination. so y’all can shut the fuck up about men being “providers” like it was some benevolent gesture, in an attempt to rationalize sexism.

Taken from Stevens Adler's book. A drummer of Guns N Roses. This were 80s but nothing has changed still in this matter.

Men will use you as long as you are useful to them. No loyalty. You didn't even follow up on her laid off Steven even after all she's done for your band? disappointing.

Then they had a manager who was sucking them dry off money and contributing to the band falling apart. Nice move.

We don't have the same power in workplace as men do to this day. You will be skipped during picking candidates for higher positions. Men will be seen as defaults. They will have higher ups reach to them directly. The company will not even do internal hiring for a position. They probably do have a candidate. A guy. Still apply. Even if you think you don't meet criteria's.