Me and who?
fluttershy X derpy/ditzy/that grey girl what with the muffins and bubbles if thou wouldst
You could say that she gives her butterflies
rewatching ever after high and wanted to doodle along! can you tell apple is my favorite character
Also yeah I changed the color of her armor WHY IS IT SILVER IN THE SHOW
I think more cis butches who want top surgery should get it, not just because it pisses off TERFs and that's funny, but because it helps normalize a post double mastectomy body on women. ya know, the thing women with breast cancer dread to have? because as a society we treat breasts as a womanly body part, and when a woman gets a literal lifesaving procedure it's treated as a tragedy cuz they're 'mutilated' now? yeah, I don't know, I think normalizing top surgery in women is a Good Thing. treating post op results from a double mastectomy as "mutilation" is super fucked up all around and is yet another example of how TERF rhetoric hurts cis women too. TERFs are so fucking stupid that they consistently harm the "real" women they claim to care so much about. shocker.
Happy hearts and hooves day <3
We need more people- idc if they’re from tadc or from 2 years ago or just from whatever- PEOPLE NEED TO SEE RAGGEDY ANN AND ANDY
Them and Sonadow ToT. I got two hands for a reason ig.
So I’m new to the Sonic fandom and I’m already discovering my newest obsession XD
Every word out of these people’s mouths is just a confession of their own transgressions. Did Not Like Us hit a little too close to home Ted, you know considering all the accusations and such?
There’s a scientific journal called “Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List”.
In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph.
An Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.
Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as “excellent” — and requested a fee of $150. While this incident is pretty hilarious, it’s a sign of a bigger problem in science publishing. This journal is one of many online-only, for-profit operations that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.