Have You See The Video Of Karlie Almost Saying “ex?”

Also, I remember Taylor saying that This Love started as a poem that she had written about somethimg that happened in her life a year before 1989 dropped.

I can't imagine what happened! 😭🥺

Of course it was a poem l—and yes... my emisue heart melts with this video. I'm crying with you friend.

Yeah, according to the lover diaries she wrote This Love in October of 2012. These lyrics hit a certain nerve for me…

"Recent Papped"

Finally I went to look at Karlie’s “recent” photos, just because I thought it was strange that they didn’t recognize Kimby in the photos. So, I found something even stranger. First, I want to say that I think these are latergram, something that KK uses routinely, so as not to indicate her whereabouts in real time. I believe that little Swift-Kloss is already among us (and God willing, far from Jerk). And in December, KK had already said how difficult it was for her to do her daily exercises, and even going up a few flights of stairs, made her very tired. So, therefore, I think it’s unlikely that she went for a walk on the street, when she is so close to her birth. Not to mention that because of the risk of contamination, and because of tiredness, it would be much safer and more comfortable for her to walk inside her property, in the external area. “After all, she lives in a mansion with Jerk”, there’s no shortage of space, and if she gets tired, she’s already “in her house”.

Second, and more importantly, there seems to be a “dispute” between the KK team and the JK team. There are 3 news, 2 from DM (Jerk’s PR) and 1 from People (Kar’s PR).

The Jerk’s team released the “papped”, on the 8 th, on the DM (it was edited two hours after publication. I don’t know what changed), and sneakily, in the captions of the photos they claim that he’s the father.

On the 9th, in the afternoon, Kar’s team responds by releasing People’s report about their walk, stressing (again) that the child is only hers. Realize that the report claims to be her baby… “Karlie Kloss is getting her steps before her baby’s arrival!”, and implies that Jerk’s the father… “Both soon-to-be parents wore baseball caps…”

But they never claim to be their child … “‘Karlie is overjoyed to be expecting her first child in 2021,’ a source close to Kloss told PEOPLE in October. ‘She will be the most amazing mother.’ ”.

And then, on the 9th, at night, Jerk’s team counters the publication of People magazine. However, now, they change tactics and are more brazen, stating in the second sentence of the story that JK is the father. In addition, they still commit the gross blunder of not knowing that the woman next to Kar is her younger sister, Kimby Kloss (I think there is a trainee in trouble. Lol).

How do I know they are two different teams? Simple, for the different ways in which both news treat Karlie. In People magazine’s report, made by Karlie’s new PR team, they use words from previous reports and, as always, highlight some of her qualities as an independent and entrepreneurial woman (Not to mention that ALL of Karlie’s team knows Kimby). In the DM’s news, Jerk’s team wanted to make it look like they were made by the KK team, but they made a mistake by using the same old, lazy style of shit published by SB, whenever he released something about KK when he was still her representative. SB talks about the clothes her wears, and always highlights Jerk. If you read it, you notice that SB mentions KK minimally, and tries to make Jerk look cool and the good guy. He emphasizes the new property that the “couple” bought “together”, which the “happy couple” intends to spend more time with family (Kushners), but points out that Jerk is totally opposed to Jared politically. There’s nothing talking about Karlie in a good light, she’s just objectified with her modeling job and the “nice” guy’s “good wife”. That is, SB used Kar’s pregnancy treacherously (typical of SB/JK) to promote Jerk in a good way. The “good” business guy, the “good” husband, the “good” father, the “good” son and the “best” brother.

Another proof of what two different teams are like is that KK’s current PR team has an approach to her pregnancy of never claiming that JK is the father of her baby (which SB did the day before yesterday). Kar’s new team, in addition to always extolling her achievements, empowers her, highlighting some of her work and, whenever appropriate, that is, that she has to mention JK, they reaffirm her liberal political position, and show the conflicts and divergences with the Kushners. They having a preference for People magazine. And always when they talk about the pregnancy, they just imply that Jerk is the father, but they never claim that the “his baby” or “their baby/child”. They always use the words “her baby”! See what happened in Gigi’s pregnancy announcement in the same magazine! They never use “her baby”, as they do in ALL the news about Karlie.

And see how it sounds and looks different “just” because of the use of a only word, “her”. In the KK’s ad, you can also deduce that there’re two things happening at the same time, semantically. Kar is expecting her first child. And while she may be expecting someone else’s baby (her first child), Kar is also with her husband (Jerk’s not the father, just the pregnant woman’s “husband”).

It’s not for nothing that SB made a point of using “her” twice in the DM reports, but in a different way.

It’s a small detail of semantics, but it’s always there, “her baby” or “her first child”, but never theirs baby.

“…But I would die for you in secret The devil’s in the details, but you got a friend in me…” (peace)

After this, I asked myself, “why do a publication so different from the first, but still implying that JK is the father?”. Because KK is still under contract (I think in the sunset clause part), and also I think this is for the narrative that the girls are likely to follow, when will she be divorced from JK, to clarify that he is not the father of Karlie’s child (Kar: “See the news! I always said that was my baby.”). And all this care in particular, leads me to believe that the girls intend to erase Jerk from the future narrative about who is the real dad of little Swift-Kloss. This will be the operation “Throwing away the trash!”. Lol. I’m of the opinion that, a good PR can do wonders in your life. And Tree is awesome at what she does! See how the Swifties still believe Toe is real, even with all the holes in their timeline. She even managed to convert some gaylors. Tree is f@#$ing awesome! (Sorry about that, Tree. But it’s as accurate as I can describe your work.)

I hate that they to imply that Jerk is the father of Tay and KK’s baby, but at least they never claim that. You must be wondering, “what difference does it make? If they imply that JK is the father, makes people still believe that it’s true.” Well, for you, it might not make any difference, but apparently it makes all the difference for the moms of little Swift-Kloss. And that, for those who still don’t understand that part, is the only thing that matters to Taylor and Karlie. They know their truth!

If you paid attention to MA, they decided to live their romantic life in secret, without an expiration date for this to cease to be so. All the little things that they share with us, through tips, small maneuvers (like this one of always saying “her baby” in the news) and the easter eggs pointing out that they’re still a couple, are not for: “Karlie still have someone to buy her adidas merchandise, she has no audience other than kaylors”; or for “Taylor to have support when she leaves”. No! Taylor and Karlie do this, because that was the only way they found to still share, with those who know that they’re a couple (although they still wear beards) and support them, a little bit of what is going on in their family life outside the spotlights.

Don’t be angry, or feel “betrayed”, or used. After all, they owe nothing to any of us, and they never asked or promised anything to anyone around here. Is it frustrating to see Jerk’s face or oat milk’s face? It sure is! Frustration is what I feel most since they disappeared from the spotlight. And look, I’ve been here since 2014, I went through the ordeal of seeing Kissgate, CH and everything else. And despite that turbulent period, at least, we had photos and videos of them together. If you’re not prepared to go through these acrobatics (with Jerk still here until his contract, finally, to end), without almost having a nervous breakdown or of anger, imagine when you realize that there is a great chance of the girls, possibly, never publicly assume not even their friendship again. So, if this is bothering you or hurting your mental health, I advise you to leave. There’re thousands of other cool things to do out there.

After all, why would they reveal their relationship to the public? For them to hear some people saying THE ABSURD that, “Taylor cares more about her masters than about her own child”?! Why bother to leave their sanctuary, if they’re going to hear this kind of shit and worse (here and in all the world media too), while now they’re living happily and at peace together? They’re even increasing their family Klan!

If they’re forced to hear RIDICULOUS things like that, I prefer that they continue to live their romance in silence.

i just can’t get over it

the other big reason why i think a lot of lesbians have always really resonated with taylor's music is because her earliest work was so clearly not written from the point of view of someone talking about real relationships she'd really had, but from the perspective of someone very sheltered and inexperienced who was writing about the way the world has taught them they SHOULD feel, if that makes sense. her whole artistic perspective has always felt like that of someone who was very intelligent but also somewhat developmentally delayed socially/romantically, and when you look at albums like debut or fearless (or even speak now, red, and 1989, tbh), it was always like, the happy/romantic songs were about fantasy scenarios or very brief initial interactions with a lot of projection and extrapolation involved, or pining after someone untouchable or unavailable, and the ones that felt "real" and like they came from actual lived experiences were about feeling let down or uncomfortable with the reality of what came after that first rush. so yeah can you IMAGINE why women and girls dealing with compulsory heterosexuality and the fallout from it might possibly relate to those themes?

i just can’t get over it

When you see them back to back like this...very compelling in my opinion 😂💕🌼

this coney island analysis though, i’ve never heard this perspective before 😭

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTRuwJRFG/

This is very interesting and explains a lot. Thanks for sharing!

okay but what about that huge safety pin hanging on the wall in the scene where Sadie is laying in bed 🤔

Back2Stonewall

Once Again Safety Pins Bring Support and Comfort To The Gay, LBT, and Marginalized Communities

After 30 years safety pins once again are providing support and a safety net for groups left feeling vulnerable in Donald Trump’s America. I

In 2008  Taylor asked a girl out on date twice on myspace