hidden messages in electronic boards
The robustness of Bitcoin’s core stands in the spotlight as concerns emerge regarding a potential vulnerability within the system: ordinals. Recently brought to attention by Bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjr, these seemingly innocuous elements pose a significant concern, sparking discussions within the cryptocurrency community.
Bitcoin’s Vulnerability Unveiled by Core Developer Luke Dashjr’s insights have ignited debates online regarding the impact of ordinals on Bitcoin’s blockchain integrity. While some view these inscriptions as an evolutionary step for BTC, Dashjr has flagged them as spam, exploiting a vulnerability within Bitcoin Core. Dashjr’s tweet highlighted the exploitation of a blockchain vulnerability by inscriptions, labeling them as a threat to Bitcoin’s security. Despite concerns, he remains optimistic about resolving these issues before the upcoming v27 release next year. Market Impact and BTC Dynamics Amidst these discussions, Bitcoin’s value currently stands at $43,926.59, experiencing a marginal 24-hour decrease but marking an impressive 11.08% surge over the past week. However, the market cap dominance remains strong at 50.05%, reflecting its resilience despite the ongoing concerns. Ordinals’ Impact on the NFTs Market The sale of ordinals has set new records, notably with the recent sale of the eighth Honey Badger series inscription for 10.4 BTC on Magic Eden. This controversial yet trending addition to the BTC blockchain has sparked significant interest within the NFT community, with the Honey Badger series comprising 10K Ordinal Inscriptions. Reshaping the NFTs Landscape As the BTC market anticipates ETFs and breaches the $43,000 mark, the Ordinals’ active trading significantly contributes to BTC’s ascent. Despite concerns like the lack of smart contracts and high transaction gas prices, enthusiasm within the Ordinals community remains undeterred. Conclusion: A Dual Impact on Bitcoin While Ordinals’ evolution mirrors BTC’s growth, concerns linger about their long-term effects on the network’s security and integrity. The market impact and growing trade volumes of Ordinals indicate their substantial influence on the NFTs landscape and Bitcoin’s overall dynamics. As the cryptocurrency world grapples with this newfound vulnerability, the evolving narrative around Ordinals continues to shape the future of Bitcoin’s ecosystem. Industry observers closely monitor Bitcoin’s response and the community’s resilience amidst these emerging challenges. Read the full article
“Dead NFTs: The Evolving Landscape of the NFT Market” is a new report from dappGambl, a community of experts in finance and blockchain technology. Upon analysis of 73,257 NFT collections, the authors found that 69,795 have a market cap of zero Ether (ETH), the second most-popular cryptocurrency behind Bitcoin. In practical terms, that means 95 percent of NFTs wouldn’t fetch a penny today — a spectacular crash for assets that reached a trading volume of $17 billion amid a frenzied bull market in 2021. The study estimates that some 23 million investors own these tokens of no practical use or value.
[...]
The “Dead NFTs” report observes that the nearly 200,000 NFT collections “with no apparent owners or market share” identified by the study caused carbon emissions equivalent to the annual output from 2,048 houses, or 3,531 cars.
There has been almost two years of silence on GTA: San Andreas for Meta Quest, and even at Meta Connect 2023 there was no update. The post There is still no trace of GTA San Andreas VR for Meta Quest appeared first on MIXED Reality News.
#AR #VR #Metaverse
On March 20, 2022, the New York Times published a 14,000-word puff piece on cryptocurrencies, both online and as an entire section of the Sunday print edition. Though its author, Kevin Roose, wrote that it aimed to be a “sober, dispassionate explanation of what crypto actually is”, it was a thinly-veiled advertisement for cryptocurrency that appeared to have received little in the way of fact-checking or critical editorial scrutiny. It uncritically repeated many questionable or entirely fallacious arguments from cryptocurrency advocates, and it appears that no experts on the topic were consulted, or even anyone with a less-than-rosy view on crypto. This is grossly irresponsible.
Here, a group of around fifteen cryptocurrency researchers and critics have done what the New York Times apparently won’t.
I like how snarky the critics are in this piece:
Tron Blockchain: Unveiling the Vision of Justin Sun
This article delves into the history of the Tron blockchain, exploring its origins, key features, and the role of Justin Sun in shaping its trajectory.
Bitcoin’s price is currently near its 18-month high at $44,000, and analysts and investors are rushing to put out higher price targets for the cryptocurrency. Many believe that Bitcoin could reach $100,000 by next year. Executives from the crypto industry, such as Michael Saylor from MicroStrategy, one of the largest Bitcoin holders, are confident that Bitcoin could double in value within 12 months. Saylor has not officially announced a price target for 2024, but he has mentioned that Bitcoin could increase by tenfold and has suggested that one day people will brag about buying five-figure Bitcoin. Other crypto executives and mainstream financial players, including Matrixport and Standard Chartered Bank, have also expressed bullish sentiment towards Bitcoin, with price targets of $125,000 and $100,000 respectively.
There are two major catalysts driving the optimistic outlook for Bitcoin. Firstly, the US market is expecting the approval of the first-ever spot Bitcoin ETF, which could attract a significant influx of institutional investor money into Bitcoin when it happens, potentially in early 2024. Secondly, the Bitcoin halving, scheduled for April 2024, is anticipated to further boost the price. In the past, the halving has led to substantial price increases, and the next halving is generating excitement among investors. However, it’s worth noting that there are risks involved, such as the SEC’s decision on the ETF and the possibility that the halving may not have the desired impact on price. Despite these uncertainties, the overall sentiment remains positive, with Bitcoin having the potential to double in value in 2024 and reach the $100,000 mark.
While the path to $100,000 seems promising, there are still potential obstacles that could impede Bitcoin’s growth. The SEC’s potential rejection of a spot Bitcoin ETF could have a negative effect, considering the significance of this development. Additionally, the Bitcoin halving may not generate the expected results, which could dampen bullish forecasts. However, considering the significant growth Bitcoin has already experienced this year, with its value more than doubling, a target of $100,000 for 2024 seems reasonable. Overall, the long-term outlook remains positive for Bitcoin.
Read the original article