... Instinctively, absolute terror makes the most sense to me, yet when I try to think this through logically, I can think of normal reasons for the first two, but not for absolute terror. This confuses me.
'there is no clock here', spoken in a variety of tones and affects; relief, calm, absolute terror
Having of seen the comment about 52% from more neutral sources, that sounds unreasonable based on the light pollution in Pyongyang, assuming that 100% of China's people have electricity.
Although it is to my awareness that at the least, environmentalism is a historical socialist secondary goal, so it would make sense that the socialist/communist countries would have less light pollution, so a light pollution comparison of NK vs SK is simply going to be wrong.
However, it is fair to compare NK and China. Obviously Wikipedia's main 2020 Dandong stats don't directly compare to Pyongyang's 2008 stats. However, a 2005 Dandong stat is seen on Wikipedia too; from this, I find it reasonable to conclude that Pyongyang is thrice as large as Dandong. Now, if I read the Wikipedia page right, Dandong is Both of those slightly larger than Pyongyang lights near the coast on North Korea's north-west border.
Therefore, I conclude that, if anything, the CIA's 26% statement is likely an overestimate; it's more likely something just under 16%, instead. Assuming China's population all has electricity, of course.
thank you wikipedia that seems like a very unbiased and reliable source
It's on the linked page, but the text below the cut is different from the linked page.
NO DAD, air brushing unlicensed images of spongebob smoking weed on to t-shirts and selling them at a boardwalk was YOUR DREAM. i'm going to be a PROJECT MANAGER.
Okay, why can I still see the shape in the decolored version of D? The others are maybe at best but D is very clear.
colorblindness check! make sure you can see all of the shapes in the circles; if not, that might mean you've lost some of your ability to see color!
I chose the 1000 because that's too many stars on tax free.
Explain your reasoning plzzz
Huh, interesting.
With this one, I'd identify his top layers as an open trenchcoat, which lacking knowledge is either uniform or personalised, a blue buttoned vest, which is most likely a jean vest, a black tie worn under the vest, then a white shirt, most likely of a sort typical of cheap formal-wear.
everyone in dual destinies: prosecutor blackquill is a true master of psychology and suggestion. he can use your own mind against you and bend you to his will without you even realizing it. a truly twisted and conniving man. what a formidable foe.
prosecutor blackquill:
I'm pretty darn sure he's here to get rich. If you can get on such a thing and get it known your on it, you can sometimes arrange to get your own money back. And also, Link has a bit of a habit of finding really expensive things.
Two lovers have reincarnated throughout history, destined to find each other and fall in love all over again. There’s also this third guy that reincarnates alongside them… we don’t really know what he does.
A wiz, pronounced the exact same way, I'm pretty sure.
Yo Danny Fenton he was just 14 and he never learned how to fucking dodge so instead he just RIPS HIS BODY IN HALF
This was funnier in my head
The issue isn't them being in a landfill, really - that has its own explosion risk issues, of course, but once it's in the landfill, I suspect glass would be worse anyways.
I haven't heard this claim about them exploding compactors, but rather of them exploding in incinerators (one of the many things one shouldn't burn). Irregardless, this isn't 'it'll start a trash fire' but rather, that they'd destroy a much more expensive piece of equipment and, in the case of the compactor, not actually wind up in the landfill they were meant to get to.