Looking through the comments on this post, it is rather clear it does not (at least under normal scenarios). Folk are clearly conflicting over if it is a good idea or not; all agree that it makes an oatmeal that tastes more so of oats.
The ones for things other than Autism are worse - I tried to take a self-fill one for distinguishing dissociative disorders from each other and easily confused disorders, and it just went such that about a third of the way through, I had declared that so many of the questions were clearly related to known issues not included in the test, were just plain not applicable, or, worse, probably but not certainly refered to a particular model of DID, that it defacto invalidated the measure.
Speaking as someone who's a. a technical writer, and b. on the spectrum, I 100% agree that the wording of most autism self-assessment schemas sucks, but fixing that is also a legitimately hard problem. Identifying neurotypes boils down to identifying habitual patterns of behaviour, and one of the frequent hallmarks of autism is having difficulty generalising from anecdotal observations to identify trends. The upshot is that an autism self-assessment that wants to be useful to its target audience is very often going to find itself in the position of trying to explain what a habitual pattern of behaviour is to someone for whom the only discernible patterns are "Every Time Forever Without Exception" and "A Series of Isolated Incidents".
He's updated every Tuesday for at least 6 years, then, if I recall things right, with possible interruptions for things like the League of Assassins and the spiders incident. If he's anything like folk expect of AO3 authors for some reason, the author's note probably contains more info than the bat report.
Interviewer: so what is your opinion on real-life fanfiction?
Cass: hmm?
Interviewer: fanfiction centering around real people. Such as yourselves.
Tim, grinning: well I mean I've been writing a self-inseet into the Wayne Family fic since I was ten, (it updates on Tuesdays, by the way) so....
Interviewer: blinks
Duke, delighted: whaaattt???
Tim: were you not made aware? I thought everyone knew, and we just weren't talking about it.
Dick: no, no that's definitely just you, Tim. Somehow it does not surprise me, though.
Tim: huh. Well, it's quite popular
Agree that it's bizarre - it's not even very interesting with these characters.
Also have to say - Danny's foes are often towards the upper end of DC's scaling in the first place, so I don't really get what you're going for with that bit? There is a bit of a tendency to downscale his opponents, but going from "reality wrapping" to basically a Lord of Order doesn't do all that much, really.
Danny gets isekai’d into the DC universe. He still is a half ghost but he’s considered a meta whose abilities activated from a trauma now. His powers are even stronger here which is good because the apparent power scaling of villains and heroes is FAR past the fights he had with ghosts in his home town.
Ignoring all of that chaos for the moment, how on earth is he going to explain to this nice older couple whose wheat fields he just crashed into that he means no harm? And why are they acting like they’ve dealt with this situation before?
Seeing people posting the full results instead of just the character they got - I somehow got the result that resonates the second least, followed by the one that resonates third least, so I suspect OP and I have very different understandings of these questions.
Now just gotta finish the result summaries <33
I love the dynamic in the Discworld fandom on this site, I think it's mainly because there are a lot of dormant fans, if you will, who've read and loved the books for years but haven't engaged much recently, who sort of reappear whenever a fun post is doing the rounds. It's fantastic. We get the cozy small fandom vibe without the screaming matches, but also get the popular posts from time to time, y'know?
And for the largest battery suckers, the most intrusive features, and the modules in modern hardware that outnumber the main ones that nobody seems to claim are used by normal programs, the product is sold by two names: the individual product name, which is useless in this kind of talk, and (Company's) AI.
In addition, a preexisting product having a marketing change to AI has been a good indicator of an observable drop of quality either soon or recently.
I don't want my cellphone to have AI I want it to have 3 days of battery time. I don't want my computer to have AI preinstalled I want it to have seven usb ports and high ram at affordable price. I don't want my games to have AI built levels I want them to be so optimized I could run them on a nokia.
"I can be myself when I'm with you" is a top tier compliment
To be clear: huge banana, not what OP implies.
mother of god
this guy
Seeing as your saying this is 13-14, I am curious about why you are saying 5'6 as an adult - most calculators I could find use the heights of both mother and father as input, which would require additional citation I'd be curious of, and the one I saw that didn't gave a taller height unless you said 14, almost 15 (14 and 10 or 11 months, for clarity).