It's wonderful how, with no warning and without even trying, we will randomly stumble across new favorite songs, new favorite artists, new favorite books, new favorite movies, new favorite games, new favorite shows, new favorite snacks, new passions, new hobbies, new interests, new favorite blogs and new favorite people. So when things are terrible, hold onto the fact that someday, possibly when you least expect it, you'll suddenly come across something wonderful!
I agree, this would be so awesome and sweet!š„¹
So much wholesomeness in one meme!
I watched the entirety of Harry Potter, and though so many tears were shed (and so many parts utterly broke my heart), I have one thing to sayā¦
(This little Snape Supremacy is made by me, I HAD to make one for him!š¤)
Take some time to relax, take a breather, drink some water, eat some food⦠you NEED and DESERVE it!
You are giving your all and doing your best, and no one could ask for more!⦠Iām thankful for you trying, Iām thankful for you being here, and Iām proud of you.š©·
Remember~
No matter what you look like, no matter what youāve been through, no matter where you come from, and no matter who you are, you are perfect just the way you are, you are strong, you are deserving of love, and you are cared for! <3
YOU ARE ENOUGH!
reblog to give the person you reblogged it from a little heart lollipop
Artists are coming back to tumblr. Nature is healing.
Like for realā¦š
(Small rant belowā¦)
I know we have the DSM-5 (which, apparently, is generally more accurate than the ICD) but I feel like bias, perception, and even pharmaceutical companies have big influence on diagnosis (and possibly even what is put in these diagnostic tools).
The things I previously listed in pink (and influence plus inaccurate/false information for big corporate money reasons) donāt help out with misdiagnosis and such.
But in saying that, we DO have the DSM-5 for a reason, so like, maybe look in it instead of basing these solely off perception.š
itās weird to think how many mental disorders are diagnosed less by what the person actually does and more by how others respond to that person. like how in hysterionic personality disorder (off to a great start) a literal diagnostic criteria is the personās emotions donāt seem convincing, which is obviously going to depend hugely upon a doctorās personal bias. and in bpd, though it isnāt a criteria, you hear about clinicians diagnosing people based on theĀ āmeat grinder sensationā (feeling like their own insides are being ground up while talking to their patient), and with autism based on theĀ āwall of glass phenomenonā (feeling like there is a barrier in reaching the person). theyāre such weird ways to talk about people especially when the clinicianās own biases are rarely taken into account.Ā
I love the celestial brothers, Sun and Moon. I like anime, anything horror related, and music.|18| (Profile Art Not Mine :D) <3
40 posts