we need more divorcebaiting. how strongly can canon imply (without technically outright stating) that these two characters are bitterly, acrimoniously divorced? essential we explore this
RAAHHHH WILL WOOD AND CHRIS DUNNE ARE TMA FANS CONFIRMED!!!!!
!mag 200 spoilers!
just realised I’m following over 300 blogs here. how did this happen. who are these people. where am i
not to spread my Web!Martin agenda but people pleasing is an unwitting form of manipulation.
It’s a well-intended trauma response, and the people doing it often don’t have that intent, but it’s very web aligned. Martin wanted people to like him, because he felt who he was intrinsically was detestable thanks to his mother. So he crafted a persona he thought would be easily liked and get the response he craved from people. WEB WEB WEB WEB WEB
Okokokokokokok tma time travel au presents lots of fun with s1 reactions to smart and all but unless I'm forgetting about something THE DON'T FUCKING REMEMBER WHAT SASHA LOOKS LIKE
@entities-of-posts PLEASE
Eyes of the forest. Aspen trees
No one talks about how michael shelley was angry. no one talks about how michael distortion was murderous. helen barely got that bad and she was the distortion during the apocalypse. michael was quiet with his anger but it ran free when he had the power to hurt people. he wanted to, somewhere deep down. that is before we get to the revenge aspect. he never grew out of his thirst for revenge towards the archives and the institute and gertrude more than anything, the one he trusted and loved like a parent who abandoned him, left him for bait. michael wanted someone dead for his pain, he wanted to hurt someone like he had been hurt.
I know for a fact that Gerry Keay uses eyeliner as lipstick and mascara to try and touch up his roots
Rain, they/themEveryone I know irl is sick of hearing about my hyperfixations so I came here instead
203 posts