Our (anti) hero ๐
Morally grey bisexual gfโs <3
Photos not mine, from Pinterest (however, the added text and filtering is done by me :)
flag id: a flag with 7 stripes, which are very dark blue, medium dark faded purple, pink, pale purple, blue, medium dark faded purple, and very dark pink. end id.
banner id: a 1500x150 teal banner with the words โplease read my dni before interactingโ in large white text in the center. end id.
a flag for bi-cycle [pt: bi-cycle /end pt] for anon!
bi-cycle either refers to bi folks who 'cycle' through preferences and attraction changes within their bi experience and/or to the actual 'cycle' itself.
the flag is inspired by the bi flag, with both dark and light shades of all three colors to represent changes in attraction/preference!
tags:ย @radiomogai, @orientation-archiveย |ย dni link
Recently Iโve been thinking about different components of sexual orientation, and how it is effectively formed of both internal identity and external behaviour. Itโs interesting that, without a detailed conversation with other individuals, we can only assume their orientation and identity on the basis of their external behaviour, which is all that is visible to us.
For example, if someone is in a long term, committed, monogamous relationship with a member of the opposite sex, they are assumed to be straight, and their behaviour is interpreted as representative of heterosexuality. But they might be bisexual. If someone is in a long term, committed, monogamous relationship with a member of the same sex, they are assumed to be gay/lesbian, and their behaviour is interpreted as representative of homosexuality. But they might be bisexual.
In this context, what external behaviour could someone exhibit that would lead to the assumption they were bisexual, and therefore that their behaviour is representative of bisexuality? Theyโd have to be engaging with the same sex and the opposite sex more or less simultaneously in order not to be assumed to be straight or gay/lesbian. How might that work?
They could be having regular sex with multiple people of both sexes (bisexuals are promiscuous, bisexuals are easy, bisexuals are sluts). They could be having multiple concurrent and short term relationships with people of both sexes (bisexuals canโt commit, bisexuals will leave you for a member of the other sex). They could be having sex with people of both sexes at the same time (bisexuals are kinky, bisexuals have group sex, bisexuals want to have threesomes all the time). They could have a committed relationship with a member of one sex, and affairs with members of the other sex (bisexuals CHEAT). They could be non-monogamous and having various relationships with members of both sexes (bisexuals canโt be satisfied with just one person).
So. In order for other people to recognise you as a bisexual person, you have to be engaging in some form of stigmatised and nonconforming sexual activity, all of which just happen to be typical stereotypes about bisexuality. The only way to be perceived as a bisexual person is to conform with bisexual stereotypes. A bisexual person who doesnโt conform to a single bisexual stereotype cannot be perceived as a bisexual person, and therefore cannot disprove or undermine those stereotypes in the mind of the person perceiving them. Because if they donโt conform to a single bisexual stereotype, they are perceived as heterosexual/homosexual, and their nice, conforming, virtuous behaviour is ascribed to that perceived monosexual identity. Even if they had previously exhibited bisexual behaviour (bisexuality is just a phase, theyโll eventually pick a side).
Alternatively, they could verbally assert their identity regularly enough to offset the assumptions others make on the basis of their behaviour (bisexuals are self-obsessed).
There is no way of being consistently perceived as a bisexual person, in the current landscape, without reinforcing bisexual stereotypes in the minds of those perceiving you, because if you donโt align with and reinforce those stereotypes you are unperceivable as a bisexual person.
the bisexual pride flag was unvelied for the first time on december 5, 1998
the pink represents same gender attraction
the blue the attraction to different genders
purple, the resulting overlap of the two color, represent bisexuality and its uniqueness and entirety
bisexual people can have overlap experiences and history with other communities but we are also a separate and unique sexuality and identity, we are not โhalf straight and half gayโ and we shouldnโt be perceived or treated as such. just like we see purple as its own color.
it was designed by michael page who took inspiration from the โbi trianglesโ also called โbianglesโ, created by liz nania in the 1985
it was important for her emphasizing both bi visibility and its existence outside of binary AND how we have always belonged in the queer community
Data from a recent report, which shows which types of relationships bisexual people are in. So you all can stop with your biphobic โbisexuals are always in M/F relationshipsโ nonsense.
(Note: binary trans people are included in the first graphic. The last two graphics are just created to be exclusively about them.)
Graphics by @isthisbicuIture on Twitter
Study: https://www.ilga-europe.org/report/intersections-the-lgbti-ii-survey-bisexuals-analysis/
โฝโพ bi blog โ learn ur historyop (pride-cat, whom you can call aster) goes by he/she and identifies as butch (but is often inactive) icon credit: n7punk | header credit: mybigraphics
232 posts