Strawberry Moon 🍓or🌕 Https://www.instagram.com/p/CQjiP5VrM3H/?utm_medium=tumblr

Knows relatively everything, but absolutely nothing!

Finding the laws and wonders of nature and the universe has not been and is not interesting for most of the people. Regulating the issues that we face in daily life has not been surprising, too. On the other hand, the irregularity of those issues is not interesting either!

So what surprises us?

People are often surprised by nonsense issues (nonsense in my view) and encourage them instead of being surprised by scientific facts. Surprisingly, these people have understood the facts better than scientists and scholars!

They have understood that our nature as human beings has always tended to be surprised; therefore, any law, whether scientific, experimental or intuitive, that doesn't cause surprise might be doubted, because it may not in analogous with our nature. Humanity eager to be surprised. I do not know if this trait is good or bad, but I know it is a fact for a realist. Although we prefer that everything be predictable, there is no doubt that unforeseen events have surprised us the most and challenged our knowledge and experience to the extent that the advancement of science owes to them today. Hence, it seems that scientists prefer to be surprised rather than taking refuge to predictable issues.

The problem is that we always pay attention to the cause for surprise rather than the surprise itself. This illusions arise from this fact that any group is eager to surprise people by its own favorite topic. In fact, what is surprising is the surprise itself not the cause of surprise. The surprise itself is a mere concept.

A less related example may increase the transparency of my discussion! We are all familiar with something called the "aha moment". The moment you reach the solution, the answer, or the desired results. Most of us think that that moment is amazing because we came up with a unique solution, answer, or result that can be expressed as a rule. However, it is amazing because the solution or result was beyond the researcher's previous imagination/thoughts, and not because the researcher discovered a hidden law. If the researcher knows what he is looking for and only more accuracy than previous efforts will lead him to the desired solutions or results, then what curiosity means at all! In this case, he would rather be a science businessman or science entertainer than a scientist. Only that accuracy and perfection will be more significant if it leads to a surprise.

If someone told you "I/we know that...", do not believe it, even if what he/she said was the result of a lifetime experience. If everything is supposed to be certain from someone’s point of view, we humans would have realized the mechanism of the universe a long time ago, but we couldn't! Then it seems that we face with twofold problem; no one knows, or everyone knows.

If someone says "I know this ...", then everyone knows it. But if even one person did not accept it, then the first speaker did not know, too. When we are trying to express our ideas it is safe to emphasize that we claim knowing something based our personal experience at a particular period of time. But we always generalize our spatial and temporal experiences due to our language limitations, and this will definitely be fun for future intelligent generations.

Nevertheless, the only principle that can be relied upon is that whoever told "I/we know this ...", "I/we believe in ...", etc., should not be expected to surprise us and consequently have a profound effect on our life.

I always like to be surprised, whether by a single person or a creative group, such that my whole life and experiences be questioned. That allows me to rethought and reinvent.

I never like to be a scientist, not an intellectual, not a science businessman, not a science entertainer. I always want to be surprised such that all or part of my experience and knowledge be completely challenged.

TOURNAMENT EARTH 2021

Vote at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/tournament-earth

Let's guess which images others are going to take to the final stage.

Although there are definitely many parameters, such games have always been enjoyable for me. So let's have a try.

In the image below, those images that are connected in a straight line are my choices for the final stage.

However, people are not going to have them as their choice.

I have considered some imaginary behavioral filters and are going to anticipate that whcih images will be chosen based on those filters.

F1: Entertainment filter. For example, The image of a racetrack from astronauts' perspective is likely to be more appealing to people.

F2: Chaos and excitement filter. One of the strangest traits of most people is that they escape chaos in their lives but enjoy seeing a chaotic phenomenon when they and their fellows are in a comfort zone!

F3: Tendency to artificiality. People like artificial things more than facts.

F4: Tendency to colorful life without engaging to details.

F5: Hope for strange events.

F6: Passion for power even it was destructive!

F7: Eagerness for bold things.

F8: They believe that life is more beautiful than what they encountered in their daily life!

F9: Quality filter. It depends on the screen they vote on. If we considered most of them will vote on Mobile screen then they may act like what I chosed above.

F10: Passion for mysterious and unkown things because they think that some unkowns have not yet revealed in them.

A Flawed Ingenuity!

If you want to use ingenuity to refer indiscriminately to all human mental activity, as Descartes, in order to inspire a whole generation, your achievements or characteristic should not be flawless! Otherwise, you will not be able to inspire next generations and lead them to next level.

"Hence memory is the same as imagination […], and imagination is likewise taken for ingenuity or invention,”.

Human ingenuity is "sharp," "acute," or "penetrating", which is able to understand relations.

If we want to act non-discriminative in order to inspire next generations, we must accept that we are the product of an evolution and we are still very young in the process! Hence, our imagination must be yet smooth rather than sharp. Therefore, how we can refer genius to an achievement or someone of our own kind if that thing can be free of flaws and error over time!

I may like to refer geniuses to those great minds who either imperfectly answered the big questions or asked big questions that the questions themselves had a flaw with. Because, those errors and flaws inspire next generations to improve on their great achievements, and consequently, lead to next level of evolution.

However, a big question arises that what is the role of perseverance here?

Finally, how I could be honest with what I wrote in this post if my memory helped me to remember which great minds used those terms, shown inside “ ”, in order to refer to them on this post!

Anyway, the moon was moving before the stars appeared!

I have never been able to come up with a precise and unique definition of the word “ideal”, like ideal conditions. For example, what conditions might be ideal for a full moon day? A clear sky and living in a small and remote town with less light noise might be considered as an ideal condition for observing a big and bright full moon. However, it has always been a question for me whether the facts we want to observe defines the ideal condition or the ideal conditions determine the facts. I never found an answer to this dilemma, but I made a solution to solve such dilemma for myself. Most of the time I realized that before answering a question, the definition of all phrases inside the question had to be defined precisely from the questioner’s point of view. The problem is that I always had trouble defining the facts and phrases.

The problem in my mind arise from this question that what if the truth is not unique? In this case, the definition of ideal condition should not be unique. So if the ideal situation is not unique, it means that the facts is not unique and a different fact can be achieved in different ideal conditions for an identical event. For example, if the observing of a big and bright moon on a full moon night is an ideal condition, so forecasting a cloudy night can ruin your whole day. That day should be regretted for losing a unique fact due to the lack of unique ideal condition.

I had already learned to regret and be depressed in those days until I tried to change the meaning of the facts for myself and define it from scratch for myself. Practicing this strategy helped me realize over time that the facts are never the same and unique to a subject. And this might be what causes to have diversity in human species and their thoughts about different events, which makes the earth a very beautiful place, but makes life complex and sometimes difficult. Maybe it is better learn to find more beauty in the complexities to enjoy life!

I remember the day I saw for the first time in my life that the moon was moving by the clouds for a few seconds, but in order not to look stupid I had to convince myself that those few seconds were nothing more than imaginary and that it was the clouds were moving. But the moon was moving! It was as if there were ideal conditions that allowed the moon to move in my view for just a few seconds.

Stubbornness to look stupid allowed me to ask: does the movement of other objects determine where I am, or does my position determine the type and direction of movement of other objects? Anyway, I always had a full moon without a pre-determined schedule, and if I was lucky and the weather was cloudy and there was good light noise, I would see at first glance that the moon was moving behind the cloud. But it did not take long for my eyes to get used to the darkness of the night and pinpoint the faint stars and realize that I was on Earth and it was the clouds passing in front of the moon.

I later found out that light noise is not a bad thing either. Light noise helped me not be able to pinpoint faint stars next to the full moon, which in turn helped me not to limit the observable space of the moon to a certain boundary. From then on, I realized that any condition can be ideal for a different fact if I do not consider it to be a mere and unique fact. This kind of thinking made me realize that any situation can be ideal for understanding different aspects of a fact, even if that condition is not an ideal condition for others as they already intended to understand the same fact in a different ideal condition. This makes us more open-minded in accepting the realities of life than in resisting.

The problem is that the facts from different perspectives are not in line with society's beliefs, can lead to isolation, but instead you learn that every problem has a solution, although different, difficult, not conventional, and, consequently, time consuming.

It is yet a big question for me whether the facts we want to observe defines the ideal conditions or the ideal conditions determine the facts. Maybe one day I will come to the conclusion that both were an identical question; or maybe I didn’t ask the right question.

Anyway, the moon was moving before the stars appeared!

We All Are Idiots!

"I see a canoid patch of colour"

Such images evoke the "primary language" in me which belongs to a lower level of language hierarchy.

like Images, the existence of a hierarchy in language is essential because we have to live in a society made up of people with different backgrounds and desires, idiots are also included!

High-level language is necessary to deal with the idiots of society, and also we have to construct " the language" instead of "a language". never, the higher the level of language in "the language" hierarchy, the farther we are from having a unique interpretation about the facts.

The primary language confined to matters belonging to the biography of the interpreter without engaging any element of inference in order to become "all" observers rather than "some" observers. So primary language a lower level of language hierarchy is more appropriate to describe such images, though we may seem idiot this time!

"I see a canoid patch of colour"

The question is that whether that insect was in the middle of the flower flag and got me to capture it, or whether my ideal photo was to wait for the insect to reach the center of the flower flag and take that moment.

These questions and choosing one of them would lead me to write different captions for this post.

But the question is what kind of photo of this scene could fit the caption with the content written above.

It is possible to capture such a creative image, but the problem arises when I say:

In fact, I did not notice the insect in the middle of the flower flag, nor did I wait for the insect to reach to the middle of the flower flag; There was another bigger insect on the flower that I wanted to capture it, which flew at the moment the photo was taken. However, I noticed this beautiful photo later and decided to post it with a caption that has the content written above.

Now the question is what kind of photo of this scene could have been taken to evoke a a caption that has the content written so far in the mind of the audience without making me to post such an image with a caption that has the content written so far!

This is what art does to motivate our imagination to find the right, original, and undirected questions.

Do you prefer to have your heart beats or it is a necessity?

Do you prefer to protect the Earth from an impact by an asteroid or it is necessary to protect it?

A free man may prefer what he can do, to what he cannot do.

However, modern man thinks that necessity has made these dilemmas unalterable and this is why he is less happy. Because he did not learn to prefer what he can do to what he cannot do!

I do not believe in the word happiness or misery, but if these words were to be true, happy people would probably make more prefers such that necessity would have no meaning in their lives.

Sometimes time is deceptive and we think that because of the lower risk in the near future we would prefer to protect the Earth from an impact by an asteroid, but in fact we consider it necessary or at least we have to induce it! Humans have been so preoccupied with necessities throughout evolution that we sometimes even have to make what we do necessary for them instead of presenting it as our preference. They are more concerned with necessities than preferences, and this is not their fault.

Imagine a generation who really prefer what they can do to what they cannot! Sometimes this is not even imaginable to me! Imagine open-minded and happy generations who prefer to have their heart beat rather than an unalterable necessity. Imagine a free generation of who prefer to protect the Earth from the impact of an asteroid the rather than considering it as an unalterable necessity.

They prefer more than us to the point that necessity no longer makes sense. In order to have free, happy, and open-minded generations, so that preference takes the place of necessity, we need to teach them to prefer more. To this end, they must first eliminate their fear of the future: the fear is tied to our age’s necessities! This is a great start.

How much do you think that “preferring” to protect the Earth is a sign of freedom for humanity?

#DartMission

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope will be launched this September.

—————————————

“This painting painting was painted within a limited period of time before light and atmospheric conditions change.”

Would you like your car to have a powerful mirror such that shows you the origin from which you moved?

Our answer to this question is most likely negative.

There is no point for most of us in such mirrors. What do you think makes a person so interested in such a powerful mirror in his car that he would like to see even the origin in it?

Such a person either possibly has Alzheimer's, or he does not have the clock or specific signs to accurately determine time, and can only determine time by where he is/was. In other words, our imaginary person needs a momentary awareness of his place in order to be able to discern the transition of time during his journey. One of the easiest solutions for him would be to divide the path into smaller and more visible pieces so that the end of each piece is both a new destination and a new origin or the beginning of the next piece. Each piece cannot exceed the maximum length of his car—the only available measurement available to him.

The question is whether our imaginary person merely makes such a segmentation of the path to determine time because his presence in space and time forces him to make such a segmentation of his path, or whether his latent habit of segmenting the path forces him to create imaginary concepts such as space and time for him.

It most likely depends on the type of development and growth of his intelligence. If you are a creature whose mind is suddenly formed and does not undergo any change over time, then such an idea and segmentation will only be made by your mind, which will subsequently create concepts such as space and time and movement in it, which may It really does not exist.

But if your mind has evolved over time, and, more importantly, you are a creature that sees your mother at birth blurry as a single body and details are added to your mother after growth, such as having five fingers with different sizes, in this case, in this case, segmenting the continuous components and differentiating between the parts and the whole of a set will be necessary for your understanding of the environment surrounding you. In fact, you will need such segmentation and differentiating to understand the space and time you are really in. Because you discern your body as a whole such that it is bigger than your little finger as a part. In the absence of such an evolution, it was unlikely that you would perceive space, time, and the environment around you in this way. Evolution, therefore, has left us with no choice but to segment our environment into different parts in order to understand it along with its space and time.

For example, if we evolved in such a way that we grow from old age to childhood, we would certainly have a different perception, so that continuity, instead of segmentation, would be an integral part of our perception. We even could not discern that our body was bigger than our little fingers. Because our brains were supposed to evolve in such a way that our perception goes from the disintegration of our mother's fingers in our old age to their continuity with our blur vision in childhood. It is difficult for us to understand this because we stay in these stages for a short time and spend most of our lives with little change.

Thus, the true and of course complex idea for our imaginary person would be the idea that he segments his path and turn it into an infinite origin and destination so that he can gain an understanding of the path and the space and time in which he is. To this end, he would definitely need a powerful mirror in which he could see all the previous origins and destinations to determine his place, time, and movement during his journey. Because he needs to compare the origin and the destinations ahead with his previous ones in order to recognize that he is moving.

Otherwise, he would have no understanding of his movement, speed, place and time as an evolved being that lived from childhood to Youth.

Creatures looking for powerful mirrors certainly have their brains evolved over time, from weaker vision to stronger vision. strong and weak here do not mean the power of vision or field of vision, but rather the degree of understanding of details of generalities during their evolution. Creatures who make powerful mirrors have certainly lived from childhood to old age. They have definitely gone from a blurry vision in childhood to a clearer vision in youth. They have gone from more vague memories to more stable memories. creatures who have reached to childhood from old age cannot show such a passion for larger and more powerful mirrors, and even such creatures cannot have the characteristic of curiosity.

You may not be very interested in powerful mirrors in your car right now, but you will definitely need them in the future when traveling at very high speeds. Then it will no longer be a question of being interested or excited about them, but then you will need them.

Apart from that, imagine humans evolving from old age to childhood. As we have discussed, such beings could only have an imaginary understanding of space and time, and space and time were made by their minds, even if space and time existed independently in their world. How were they going to deal with these two issues, or did they even realize that there were two different issues? I do not think they were curious enough to seek the answer to such a question, but if we and they could live together, we would definitely become more intelligent beings.

Image source: https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/features/jwstArt/index.html

Probably the owner of this skull could not forget the pain and the memory of an accident for the rest of her life. Surely what I could not forget years after seeing this historical skull was the delicacy, passion and effort to reconstruct and improve the consequences of the accident, and not the accident and the pain that the body probably could not forget. https://www.instagram.com/p/CTs2hMnoxpK/?utm_medium=tumblr

If one asks about the characteristics of the observer of these images in order to be able to compare them with the images that can be taken with the same observers and arrive at a unique interpretation of the components of these images, he is an scientist/expert.

If someone, by looking at these pictures, provides answers or views that make me start thinking and asking questions about those answers and views, he is a philosopher.

If anyone both asks questions about the characteristics of the observer and offers answers and views that I am just beginning to think about and ask questions about, she is Newton or Einstein.

If anyone is insists on seeking the creator of those stuff inside the pictures, he is a religious person.

Meanwhile, If I take a stand against the questions are asked or the answers are given, I am a fanatic.

Nevertheless, I did not take this photos, it was taken by those who were next to me. I was fascinated by watching this scene and that moment is called life.

✨Life is more beautiful than all those discussed above.✨