A Flawed Ingenuity!

The question is that whether that insect was in the middle of the flower flag and got me to capture it, or whether my ideal photo was to wait for the insect to reach the center of the flower flag and take that moment.

These questions and choosing one of them would lead me to write different captions for this post.

But the question is what kind of photo of this scene could fit the caption with the content written above.

It is possible to capture such a creative image, but the problem arises when I say:

In fact, I did not notice the insect in the middle of the flower flag, nor did I wait for the insect to reach to the middle of the flower flag; There was another bigger insect on the flower that I wanted to capture it, which flew at the moment the photo was taken. However, I noticed this beautiful photo later and decided to post it with a caption that has the content written above.

Now the question is what kind of photo of this scene could have been taken to evoke a a caption that has the content written so far in the mind of the audience without making me to post such an image with a caption that has the content written so far!

This is what art does to motivate our imagination to find the right, original, and undirected questions.

We All Are Idiots!

"I see a canoid patch of colour"

Such images evoke the "primary language" in me which belongs to a lower level of language hierarchy.

like Images, the existence of a hierarchy in language is essential because we have to live in a society made up of people with different backgrounds and desires, idiots are also included!

High-level language is necessary to deal with the idiots of society, and also we have to construct " the language" instead of "a language". never, the higher the level of language in "the language" hierarchy, the farther we are from having a unique interpretation about the facts.

The primary language confined to matters belonging to the biography of the interpreter without engaging any element of inference in order to become "all" observers rather than "some" observers. So primary language a lower level of language hierarchy is more appropriate to describe such images, though we may seem idiot this time!

"I see a canoid patch of colour"

If one asks about the characteristics of the observer of these images in order to be able to compare them with the images that can be taken with the same observers and arrive at a unique interpretation of the components of these images, he is an scientist/expert.

If someone, by looking at these pictures, provides answers or views that make me start thinking and asking questions about those answers and views, he is a philosopher.

If anyone both asks questions about the characteristics of the observer and offers answers and views that I am just beginning to think about and ask questions about, she is Newton or Einstein.

If anyone is insists on seeking the creator of those stuff inside the pictures, he is a religious person.

Meanwhile, If I take a stand against the questions are asked or the answers are given, I am a fanatic.

Nevertheless, I did not take this photos, it was taken by those who were next to me. I was fascinated by watching this scene and that moment is called life.

✨Life is more beautiful than all those discussed above.✨

Mistakes and uncertainties are not due to our lack of sufficient knowledge and experience. In many cases, despite having enough knowledge and experience, we still make mistakes or there are uncertainties in us. It may be argued that this was due to inaccuracies or lack of thoroughness. But accuracy is formed by a thorough review of all the related sciences and past experiences, experiences that are formed by mistakes and the transformation of uncertainties into uncertainties in the past. In fact, accuracy itself is expanding due to new mistakes and experiences and is not a fixed thing. The cause of mistakes, errors, and uncertainties are due to the lack of saturation of curiosity in us; in other words, the cause of errors, even in works in which we have sufficient expertise and experience, not due to inaccuracy and numerous studies, but due to lack of saturation of curiosity in us. Let's start with an example. Can you imagine infinite sweetness, infinite sour, infinite whiteness, or infinite curiosity? This is probably impossible for us as modern evolved humans. One reason for this is saturation in physics and chemistry. Our minds are naturally accustomed to saturation, and this limit does not allow us to have imagination outside the box. If we can experience the sweetness of over-saturated substances (infinite sweetness), our bodies would most likely react unexpectedly. I even think that if someone really claims strong imagination, when she wants to imagine infinite sweetness, she should get diseases like diabetes!! Certainly, our body today must react unexpectedly to such an imagination, otherwise we would not have imagined it. The only thing we can do right now is to visualize the effect of such imaginations on other things (like imagining getting sick after such an imagination), but we are not yet able to imagine those imaginations in an absolute manner, which is a sign of our imperfect evolution as human beings. We have not developed enough for such out of this world imaginations yet. This is the reason that it is difficult and astonishing for us to understand the existence of phenomena like Black holes. Our body has not perceived a gravity other than the gravity of the Earth; however, if man were able to perceive and evolve both in Earth and in another Earth that has a gravity 40000 times that of our Earth, it would be likely that saturation about gravity would be removed from his mind over time and he could think outside the box to imagine the gravity of phenomena such as Black holes today. At present, we can only imagine those things from Black holes that has nothing to do with our body's evolved nervous system. This is why it sometimes takes years of hard work to discover the mysteries of the universe that sometimes our imperfect evolution does not let our imagination to go beyond it either. But this is not the case for space and time. When I ask you to visualize infinite space, we will not face such a problem. There can be two reasons for this. First, we did not experience saturation for space during our evolution, and also thanks to great minds that were able to visualize infinite sweetness and whiteness, they introduced us to phenomena like Black hole that prevents us from forming a saturation limit in space. The second reason is that many ideas are not capable of infinity, like sweetness and curiosity, as a unique subject but this is not the case for space. Because we are talking about space infinite not infinity of space. The former can be made by our mind through repetition of ideas but the latter is an absolute matter. The space infinite is only one subject and is not repeatable by our mind. Because there will not be another space to project (space infinite +space infinite) into that space, even union (+) is not defined there. Attributes such as curiosity, sweetness and whiteness do not have such infinity feature described above for space; thus, they cannot be part of space and time, and they only made by our minds through repetition and union. The curiosity we have today is not the same as the curiosity we had a decade ago, although we call it the same curiosity. However, this is not the case for space and time, even if they are expanding and not fixed. Space and time are real because they have infinite property (infinite here is not a real infinity) that are not made by our mind. They contain an infinity that our mind has not made through repetition and union of ideas, and if our mind wants to create infinity of space infinite by repetition or union, it will not be able to do so, which shows that space and time are real. In other words, attributes such as curiosity, sweetness, and whiteness contain infinity properties that are made by our mind and they need us to have infinite properties, so they are not as independent as space and time to be real. Overall, space and time automatically have infinite properties, but attributes such as curiosity to have infinity need our imagination because they are not real like space and time. Although the physiology of our body, along with physics and chemistry, provides saturation limits for attributes such as sweetness and whiteness, fortunately we have not yet formed such saturation limit for some attributes like curiosity in our minds, and so we can imagine the infinite property for this property in our minds as we discussed before. As long as we enthusiastic about thinking outside the box, we do not have a saturation limit for curiosity, mistakes will not have a saturation limit too and uncertainty will go along with it. There is no uncertainty for absolute space and time, but there will always be uncertainty and error for all the artifacts of our minds, like curiosity, that can go to infinity. Only in a fixed or shrinking world one can claim that no mistake ever happens and there is absolute certainty, because our minds could form saturation limits for space in a such fixed world. But in a world that is expanding, the occurrence of error and uncertainty is undeniable and will continue to exist with any amount of knowledge and experience. As long as curiosity is not saturated, mistakes will inevitably occur. If we have never done any mistake and have been certain about anything, we definitely live in a world with limits, and the absence of error or lack of uncertainty is a proof of the existence of limits and saturation for the world in which we live. In fact, wherever there is mistake or uncertainty about an issue, it means that issue is followed by an attribute like curiosity that can be expanded to infinite through imagination. It can be said that we make mistakes, therefore we exist, but a God who never makes mistakes can definitely not exist. And if there is a God who makes mistakes, then he is a part of us and cannot be God. In general, trying not to make mistakes and achieving absolute certainty would be futile for a creature who can define attributes such as curiosity in space and time and expand it by its imagination power. It is better for us to talk more about our mistakes and our fears of uncertainties along with our successes in order to reach higher. Even if this writing is free from error and all these arguments are absolutely correct and valid, one should doubt that this argument is correct and valid. Image source:

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries/visions-of-the-future

Admire yourself!

“The Crab Nebula sonification”

How do you admire yourself? How do you admire others?

Has there ever been a time when there was no noise in encouraging others? There is always a certain noise in admiration: even in the admiration we give ourselves. Do you ever remember when there was no sound and noise when you did a wonderful job admiring it?!

Now, if sound is an integral part of admiration and praise in us humans, it is less unlikely that you not look crazy to others when you are used to praising yourself or your abilities. All us may have heard this popular quotation: “They who dance are thought mad by those who hear not the music.”

Now, imagine such crazy people who want to relate the universe to themselves by saying that we are the universe and the universe is us. They will try to relate the universe to themselves, of which sound and noise will be an integral part. Perhaps the best part, because they are always admiring their abilities and work. To them, sound and noise will be an integral part of things that want to glorify their beauty, and mysteries, even if they do not have the right environment to convey it.

For some people, these sounds are merely for the emotional display of the glory and beauty of these phenomena, and for others, nothing glorious can be devoid of a certain noise if they are to be related with us and admire themselves like us. Views are always different!

How can something be related to us and not use some kind of noise to praise itself?!

Have you ever tried to admire yourself without any noise?! The thought of such an endeavor may lead you to not seem insane to others which is insane in itself!

Even when I want to act logically, the noise of music affects my thoughts. Because it is less likely that the mind can praise itself without a certain noise. Listening to music reminds us of those sounds that our mind uses for its own praise, and it has always been impossible for me to ignore them.

Can you imagine a God who has no voice? Such a noiseless God never praise himself; what a helpless and weak God who has nothing in itself to admire!

When was the last time you heared or used a certain noise like crazy people?!

Video source:

https://www.nasa.gov/content/explore-from-space-to-sound

TOURNAMENT EARTH 2021

Vote at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/tournament-earth

Let's guess which images others are going to take to the final stage.

Although there are definitely many parameters, such games have always been enjoyable for me. So let's have a try.

In the image below, those images that are connected in a straight line are my choices for the final stage.

However, people are not going to have them as their choice.

I have considered some imaginary behavioral filters and are going to anticipate that whcih images will be chosen based on those filters.

F1: Entertainment filter. For example, The image of a racetrack from astronauts' perspective is likely to be more appealing to people.

F2: Chaos and excitement filter. One of the strangest traits of most people is that they escape chaos in their lives but enjoy seeing a chaotic phenomenon when they and their fellows are in a comfort zone!

F3: Tendency to artificiality. People like artificial things more than facts.

F4: Tendency to colorful life without engaging to details.

F5: Hope for strange events.

F6: Passion for power even it was destructive!

F7: Eagerness for bold things.

F8: They believe that life is more beautiful than what they encountered in their daily life!

F9: Quality filter. It depends on the screen they vote on. If we considered most of them will vote on Mobile screen then they may act like what I chosed above.

F10: Passion for mysterious and unkown things because they think that some unkowns have not yet revealed in them.

What we see, how we see, where/who we are!

I would like to think that the question of “what we see” has become an old challenge, and consequently, new generation is going to struggle with new generations of observations for decades, which will add another dimension to our observations—“how we see”. Although the new challenge would seem interesting at first glance, we need to understand “who/where we are” alongside the “how we see”. Hence, the question that will most likely affect the next generation is that “How we see, who/where we are.”

On the other hand, it may seem that the addition of the second part (who/where we are) to the main problem “how we see” bring more complexity to the main problem, or it may be seen as a parallel problem instead of an integral part of the main problem. It can be very promising if we can convince researchers that the lack of that important part (who/where we are) may be the main reason for the complexity of our observations to date. They may find out later that "who we are and where we are" should be accompanied by the question of "how we see". Most of our generation should be involved in these two issues to lead bringing out the next stage of complexity in our thoughts.

That next stage of complexity will be when we see ourselves have returned to the first place (“what we see”), which will end to a loop (what we see, how we see, who/where we are). The emergence of this loop in our observations will be inevitable—otherwise we can’t reach to a new height—such that we will find ourselves subconsciously trapped inside the loop. However, it will bring a new form of complexity to us.

When the loop is complete it will mostly look like a labyrinthine, cause the problem to become more arrogant, creating much more complex loops from within the loop. I always like to see a time when everyone is immersed in a part of those huge nested loops, and humanity experiences an original form of the complexity of thinking, imagination and observations.

This is where humans and artificial intelligence will more add to the complexity of the observations. It will be exactly where we wish some brilliant researchers pull us out of the maze.

I would like to see my knowledge and experience shattered in a whirlwind of complexity of those new thoughts. There will be no greater pleasure than to realize the simplicity of my own thoughts in opposition to those perplex thoughts. How pleasant it will be when I was unable to comprehend those labyrinthine thoughts. I would like to directly experience that such complexity baffling me to death.

This will be a real surprise for everyone.

Perseverance has collected its first scientifically-selected sample.

----------------------------------------

A mother calls her child that she recently gives birth to as her "first" child because she hopes for two things;

The first latent hope is that she can give birth to another one, the second is that the child can also be a creator like the mother in the future.

Without such hopes, the child will be the last child of the mother, or better to say that her "first" and "last" child at the same time. Without such hopes, she can "certainly" not call the child her "first" child.

Hope is the latent reason for certainty, ordering, indexing, and knowledge of states. It allows us to have some inferences and interpretations about our observations such that those inferences play as imaginary observations.

When we claim to have collected the "first" sample from the Mars, there are probably two hopes behind this claim;

First, we hope that the "second" sample will be collected in the future, or we hope that this is the only existing sample that will return to Earth and after comparing to our previous knowledge an ordinal number like "first" can be applied to it.

We humans had difficult times to survive, and, consequently, hope was necessary to human beings to overcome such difficulties over time. It has become an integral part of our temperament and identity, and has increased our desire for certainty than uncertainty.

Hope is the reason that we humans mostly tend to certainty than duality and uncertainty.  It leads to "certainty", so sometimes it can be the most deceptive thing in the world, specially for single and first observations and collections.

Although human beings strive to replace sustainability in technology with hope, this does not affect the generality of our discussion. Sustainability in technology only guarantees certainty of an event in the future while we discuss the moment that sample collected. It is obvious that everything is certain in the future!

Overall, we may not be allowed to call it first or even zeroth sample yet.

Sometime we may send a hopeless but happy mother to Mars.

"One is always wrong, but with two truth begins. One cannot prove the case, but two is irrefutable." _ Friedrich Nietzsche

Image source: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-perseverance-rover-successfully-cores-its-first-rock

It was snowing and our yard seemed to belong to another planet today. It was the first time that my cat was seeing the snow. Curious, frightened, she went down the stairs and stood at the bottom of the stairs and stared at the snow for some time. She started curling around the snow for a full circle, then stopped again and stared at the snow in fear. Then she scratched a piece of snow with her paw and pulled it over to smell it. Maybe she was seeking for some familiar smell, which was obvious from his appearance that it was not so! She stood there for a few minutes. When she understand that there was nothing left for her to be more curious about this bizarre surface, she stepped into the snow and reached the other dry side. She sat there and watched my father shoveling the snow. When she got enough of it, came home right from the middle of the snow and started licking himself as usual!

I was wondering why something that is normal for us--walking in the snow--should be so impressive to me that I want to write something about it.

In fact, the reason for the cat's action was her thoughtful and deliberately planned action rather than a simple curiosity. If the cat rudely entered the snow, her action would be funny to me than effective and inspiring.

It seems that any courageous action that is done precisely and thoughtfully, however time consuming and tedious, will definitely be effective and inspiring for others.

My father shoveled all the snow and there are no cat footprints left for me to take and share a photo for you, but here is the real story of our cat!

(1) “We think AU Mic b formed far from the star and migrated inward to its current orbit, something that can happen as planets interact gravitationally with a gas disk or with other planets,”

(2) “By contrast, Beta Pictoris b’s orbit doesn’t appear to have migrated much at all. The differences between these similarly aged systems can tell us a lot about how planets form and migrate.”

We may have a thought/problem as a star in our mind along with some ambiguous answers orbit around that thought/problem. But we often may not see progress in approaching those ambiguous answers to the core problem like Beta Pictoris system (2).

We may start thinking that the problem is at the core of our primitive thought/problem, and maybe that core is not very powerful. But I think the problem is the fear of creating chaos in our minds as AU Mic system (1) do. It is the planets and gas disk that bring AU Mic b closer to the star.

Maybe we better to act like AU Mic system when we think. We should not afraid of chaos around our primitive answers in order to tug them they come closer to the star!

Don't afraid of chaos and miss.

Image Source: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov