Mistakes And Uncertainties Are Not Due To Our Lack Of Sufficient Knowledge And Experience. In Many Cases,
Mistakes and uncertainties are not due to our lack of sufficient knowledge and experience. In many cases, despite having enough knowledge and experience, we still make mistakes or there are uncertainties in us. It may be argued that this was due to inaccuracies or lack of thoroughness. But accuracy is formed by a thorough review of all the related sciences and past experiences, experiences that are formed by mistakes and the transformation of uncertainties into uncertainties in the past. In fact, accuracy itself is expanding due to new mistakes and experiences and is not a fixed thing. The cause of mistakes, errors, and uncertainties are due to the lack of saturation of curiosity in us; in other words, the cause of errors, even in works in which we have sufficient expertise and experience, not due to inaccuracy and numerous studies, but due to lack of saturation of curiosity in us. Let's start with an example. Can you imagine infinite sweetness, infinite sour, infinite whiteness, or infinite curiosity? This is probably impossible for us as modern evolved humans. One reason for this is saturation in physics and chemistry. Our minds are naturally accustomed to saturation, and this limit does not allow us to have imagination outside the box. If we can experience the sweetness of over-saturated substances (infinite sweetness), our bodies would most likely react unexpectedly. I even think that if someone really claims strong imagination, when she wants to imagine infinite sweetness, she should get diseases like diabetes!! Certainly, our body today must react unexpectedly to such an imagination, otherwise we would not have imagined it. The only thing we can do right now is to visualize the effect of such imaginations on other things (like imagining getting sick after such an imagination), but we are not yet able to imagine those imaginations in an absolute manner, which is a sign of our imperfect evolution as human beings. We have not developed enough for such out of this world imaginations yet. This is the reason that it is difficult and astonishing for us to understand the existence of phenomena like Black holes. Our body has not perceived a gravity other than the gravity of the Earth; however, if man were able to perceive and evolve both in Earth and in another Earth that has a gravity 40000 times that of our Earth, it would be likely that saturation about gravity would be removed from his mind over time and he could think outside the box to imagine the gravity of phenomena such as Black holes today. At present, we can only imagine those things from Black holes that has nothing to do with our body's evolved nervous system. This is why it sometimes takes years of hard work to discover the mysteries of the universe that sometimes our imperfect evolution does not let our imagination to go beyond it either. But this is not the case for space and time. When I ask you to visualize infinite space, we will not face such a problem. There can be two reasons for this. First, we did not experience saturation for space during our evolution, and also thanks to great minds that were able to visualize infinite sweetness and whiteness, they introduced us to phenomena like Black hole that prevents us from forming a saturation limit in space. The second reason is that many ideas are not capable of infinity, like sweetness and curiosity, as a unique subject but this is not the case for space. Because we are talking about space infinite not infinity of space. The former can be made by our mind through repetition of ideas but the latter is an absolute matter. The space infinite is only one subject and is not repeatable by our mind. Because there will not be another space to project (space infinite +space infinite) into that space, even union (+) is not defined there. Attributes such as curiosity, sweetness and whiteness do not have such infinity feature described above for space; thus, they cannot be part of space and time, and they only made by our minds through repetition and union. The curiosity we have today is not the same as the curiosity we had a decade ago, although we call it the same curiosity. However, this is not the case for space and time, even if they are expanding and not fixed. Space and time are real because they have infinite property (infinite here is not a real infinity) that are not made by our mind. They contain an infinity that our mind has not made through repetition and union of ideas, and if our mind wants to create infinity of space infinite by repetition or union, it will not be able to do so, which shows that space and time are real. In other words, attributes such as curiosity, sweetness, and whiteness contain infinity properties that are made by our mind and they need us to have infinite properties, so they are not as independent as space and time to be real. Overall, space and time automatically have infinite properties, but attributes such as curiosity to have infinity need our imagination because they are not real like space and time. Although the physiology of our body, along with physics and chemistry, provides saturation limits for attributes such as sweetness and whiteness, fortunately we have not yet formed such saturation limit for some attributes like curiosity in our minds, and so we can imagine the infinite property for this property in our minds as we discussed before. As long as we enthusiastic about thinking outside the box, we do not have a saturation limit for curiosity, mistakes will not have a saturation limit too and uncertainty will go along with it. There is no uncertainty for absolute space and time, but there will always be uncertainty and error for all the artifacts of our minds, like curiosity, that can go to infinity. Only in a fixed or shrinking world one can claim that no mistake ever happens and there is absolute certainty, because our minds could form saturation limits for space in a such fixed world. But in a world that is expanding, the occurrence of error and uncertainty is undeniable and will continue to exist with any amount of knowledge and experience. As long as curiosity is not saturated, mistakes will inevitably occur. If we have never done any mistake and have been certain about anything, we definitely live in a world with limits, and the absence of error or lack of uncertainty is a proof of the existence of limits and saturation for the world in which we live. In fact, wherever there is mistake or uncertainty about an issue, it means that issue is followed by an attribute like curiosity that can be expanded to infinite through imagination. It can be said that we make mistakes, therefore we exist, but a God who never makes mistakes can definitely not exist. And if there is a God who makes mistakes, then he is a part of us and cannot be God. In general, trying not to make mistakes and achieving absolute certainty would be futile for a creature who can define attributes such as curiosity in space and time and expand it by its imagination power. It is better for us to talk more about our mistakes and our fears of uncertainties along with our successes in order to reach higher. Even if this writing is free from error and all these arguments are absolutely correct and valid, one should doubt that this argument is correct and valid. Image source:
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galleries/visions-of-the-future
More Posts from Ehsunassadi and Others
What we see, how we see, where/who we are!
I would like to think that the question of “what we see” has become an old challenge, and consequently, new generation is going to struggle with new generations of observations for decades, which will add another dimension to our observations—“how we see”. Although the new challenge would seem interesting at first glance, we need to understand “who/where we are” alongside the “how we see”. Hence, the question that will most likely affect the next generation is that “How we see, who/where we are.”
On the other hand, it may seem that the addition of the second part (who/where we are) to the main problem “how we see” bring more complexity to the main problem, or it may be seen as a parallel problem instead of an integral part of the main problem. It can be very promising if we can convince researchers that the lack of that important part (who/where we are) may be the main reason for the complexity of our observations to date. They may find out later that "who we are and where we are" should be accompanied by the question of "how we see". Most of our generation should be involved in these two issues to lead bringing out the next stage of complexity in our thoughts.
That next stage of complexity will be when we see ourselves have returned to the first place (“what we see”), which will end to a loop (what we see, how we see, who/where we are). The emergence of this loop in our observations will be inevitable—otherwise we can’t reach to a new height—such that we will find ourselves subconsciously trapped inside the loop. However, it will bring a new form of complexity to us.
When the loop is complete it will mostly look like a labyrinthine, cause the problem to become more arrogant, creating much more complex loops from within the loop. I always like to see a time when everyone is immersed in a part of those huge nested loops, and humanity experiences an original form of the complexity of thinking, imagination and observations.
This is where humans and artificial intelligence will more add to the complexity of the observations. It will be exactly where we wish some brilliant researchers pull us out of the maze.
I would like to see my knowledge and experience shattered in a whirlwind of complexity of those new thoughts. There will be no greater pleasure than to realize the simplicity of my own thoughts in opposition to those perplex thoughts. How pleasant it will be when I was unable to comprehend those labyrinthine thoughts. I would like to directly experience that such complexity baffling me to death.
This will be a real surprise for everyone.
TOURNAMENT EARTH 2021
Vote at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/tournament-earth
Let's guess which images others are going to take to the final stage.
Although there are definitely many parameters, such games have always been enjoyable for me. So let's have a try.
In the image below, those images that are connected in a straight line are my choices for the final stage.
However, people are not going to have them as their choice.
I have considered some imaginary behavioral filters and are going to anticipate that whcih images will be chosen based on those filters.
F1: Entertainment filter. For example, The image of a racetrack from astronauts' perspective is likely to be more appealing to people.
F2: Chaos and excitement filter. One of the strangest traits of most people is that they escape chaos in their lives but enjoy seeing a chaotic phenomenon when they and their fellows are in a comfort zone!
F3: Tendency to artificiality. People like artificial things more than facts.
F4: Tendency to colorful life without engaging to details.
F5: Hope for strange events.
F6: Passion for power even it was destructive!
F7: Eagerness for bold things.
F8: They believe that life is more beautiful than what they encountered in their daily life!
F9: Quality filter. It depends on the screen they vote on. If we considered most of them will vote on Mobile screen then they may act like what I chosed above.
F10: Passion for mysterious and unkown things because they think that some unkowns have not yet revealed in them.
NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope will be launched this September.
—————————————
“This painting painting was painted within a limited period of time before light and atmospheric conditions change.”
Would you like your car to have a powerful mirror such that shows you the origin from which you moved?
Our answer to this question is most likely negative.
There is no point for most of us in such mirrors. What do you think makes a person so interested in such a powerful mirror in his car that he would like to see even the origin in it?
Such a person either possibly has Alzheimer's, or he does not have the clock or specific signs to accurately determine time, and can only determine time by where he is/was. In other words, our imaginary person needs a momentary awareness of his place in order to be able to discern the transition of time during his journey. One of the easiest solutions for him would be to divide the path into smaller and more visible pieces so that the end of each piece is both a new destination and a new origin or the beginning of the next piece. Each piece cannot exceed the maximum length of his car—the only available measurement available to him.
The question is whether our imaginary person merely makes such a segmentation of the path to determine time because his presence in space and time forces him to make such a segmentation of his path, or whether his latent habit of segmenting the path forces him to create imaginary concepts such as space and time for him.
It most likely depends on the type of development and growth of his intelligence. If you are a creature whose mind is suddenly formed and does not undergo any change over time, then such an idea and segmentation will only be made by your mind, which will subsequently create concepts such as space and time and movement in it, which may It really does not exist.
But if your mind has evolved over time, and, more importantly, you are a creature that sees your mother at birth blurry as a single body and details are added to your mother after growth, such as having five fingers with different sizes, in this case, in this case, segmenting the continuous components and differentiating between the parts and the whole of a set will be necessary for your understanding of the environment surrounding you. In fact, you will need such segmentation and differentiating to understand the space and time you are really in. Because you discern your body as a whole such that it is bigger than your little finger as a part. In the absence of such an evolution, it was unlikely that you would perceive space, time, and the environment around you in this way. Evolution, therefore, has left us with no choice but to segment our environment into different parts in order to understand it along with its space and time.
For example, if we evolved in such a way that we grow from old age to childhood, we would certainly have a different perception, so that continuity, instead of segmentation, would be an integral part of our perception. We even could not discern that our body was bigger than our little fingers. Because our brains were supposed to evolve in such a way that our perception goes from the disintegration of our mother's fingers in our old age to their continuity with our blur vision in childhood. It is difficult for us to understand this because we stay in these stages for a short time and spend most of our lives with little change.
Thus, the true and of course complex idea for our imaginary person would be the idea that he segments his path and turn it into an infinite origin and destination so that he can gain an understanding of the path and the space and time in which he is. To this end, he would definitely need a powerful mirror in which he could see all the previous origins and destinations to determine his place, time, and movement during his journey. Because he needs to compare the origin and the destinations ahead with his previous ones in order to recognize that he is moving.
Otherwise, he would have no understanding of his movement, speed, place and time as an evolved being that lived from childhood to Youth.
Creatures looking for powerful mirrors certainly have their brains evolved over time, from weaker vision to stronger vision. strong and weak here do not mean the power of vision or field of vision, but rather the degree of understanding of details of generalities during their evolution. Creatures who make powerful mirrors have certainly lived from childhood to old age. They have definitely gone from a blurry vision in childhood to a clearer vision in youth. They have gone from more vague memories to more stable memories. creatures who have reached to childhood from old age cannot show such a passion for larger and more powerful mirrors, and even such creatures cannot have the characteristic of curiosity.
You may not be very interested in powerful mirrors in your car right now, but you will definitely need them in the future when traveling at very high speeds. Then it will no longer be a question of being interested or excited about them, but then you will need them.
Apart from that, imagine humans evolving from old age to childhood. As we have discussed, such beings could only have an imaginary understanding of space and time, and space and time were made by their minds, even if space and time existed independently in their world. How were they going to deal with these two issues, or did they even realize that there were two different issues? I do not think they were curious enough to seek the answer to such a question, but if we and they could live together, we would definitely become more intelligent beings.
Image source: https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/features/jwstArt/index.html
Admire yourself!
“The Crab Nebula sonification”
How do you admire yourself? How do you admire others?
Has there ever been a time when there was no noise in encouraging others? There is always a certain noise in admiration: even in the admiration we give ourselves. Do you ever remember when there was no sound and noise when you did a wonderful job admiring it?!
Now, if sound is an integral part of admiration and praise in us humans, it is less unlikely that you not look crazy to others when you are used to praising yourself or your abilities. All us may have heard this popular quotation: “They who dance are thought mad by those who hear not the music.”
Now, imagine such crazy people who want to relate the universe to themselves by saying that we are the universe and the universe is us. They will try to relate the universe to themselves, of which sound and noise will be an integral part. Perhaps the best part, because they are always admiring their abilities and work. To them, sound and noise will be an integral part of things that want to glorify their beauty, and mysteries, even if they do not have the right environment to convey it.
For some people, these sounds are merely for the emotional display of the glory and beauty of these phenomena, and for others, nothing glorious can be devoid of a certain noise if they are to be related with us and admire themselves like us. Views are always different!
How can something be related to us and not use some kind of noise to praise itself?!
Have you ever tried to admire yourself without any noise?! The thought of such an endeavor may lead you to not seem insane to others which is insane in itself!
Even when I want to act logically, the noise of music affects my thoughts. Because it is less likely that the mind can praise itself without a certain noise. Listening to music reminds us of those sounds that our mind uses for its own praise, and it has always been impossible for me to ignore them.
Can you imagine a God who has no voice? Such a noiseless God never praise himself; what a helpless and weak God who has nothing in itself to admire!
When was the last time you heared or used a certain noise like crazy people?!
Video source:
https://www.nasa.gov/content/explore-from-space-to-sound
The question is that whether that insect was in the middle of the flower flag and got me to capture it, or whether my ideal photo was to wait for the insect to reach the center of the flower flag and take that moment.
These questions and choosing one of them would lead me to write different captions for this post.
But the question is what kind of photo of this scene could fit the caption with the content written above.
It is possible to capture such a creative image, but the problem arises when I say:
In fact, I did not notice the insect in the middle of the flower flag, nor did I wait for the insect to reach to the middle of the flower flag; There was another bigger insect on the flower that I wanted to capture it, which flew at the moment the photo was taken. However, I noticed this beautiful photo later and decided to post it with a caption that has the content written above.
Now the question is what kind of photo of this scene could have been taken to evoke a a caption that has the content written so far in the mind of the audience without making me to post such an image with a caption that has the content written so far!
This is what art does to motivate our imagination to find the right, original, and undirected questions.
Do you prefer to have your heart beats or it is a necessity?
Do you prefer to protect the Earth from an impact by an asteroid or it is necessary to protect it?
A free man may prefer what he can do, to what he cannot do.
However, modern man thinks that necessity has made these dilemmas unalterable and this is why he is less happy. Because he did not learn to prefer what he can do to what he cannot do!
I do not believe in the word happiness or misery, but if these words were to be true, happy people would probably make more prefers such that necessity would have no meaning in their lives.
Sometimes time is deceptive and we think that because of the lower risk in the near future we would prefer to protect the Earth from an impact by an asteroid, but in fact we consider it necessary or at least we have to induce it! Humans have been so preoccupied with necessities throughout evolution that we sometimes even have to make what we do necessary for them instead of presenting it as our preference. They are more concerned with necessities than preferences, and this is not their fault.
Imagine a generation who really prefer what they can do to what they cannot! Sometimes this is not even imaginable to me! Imagine open-minded and happy generations who prefer to have their heart beat rather than an unalterable necessity. Imagine a free generation of who prefer to protect the Earth from the impact of an asteroid the rather than considering it as an unalterable necessity.
They prefer more than us to the point that necessity no longer makes sense. In order to have free, happy, and open-minded generations, so that preference takes the place of necessity, we need to teach them to prefer more. To this end, they must first eliminate their fear of the future: the fear is tied to our age’s necessities! This is a great start.
How much do you think that “preferring” to protect the Earth is a sign of freedom for humanity?
#DartMission
It is easy when the argument is that you are single or in a relationship because it is a binary state (single or in a relationship). You do not even need to be judged by others because you will choose one of these two options. This was true for gender in the past, but it is no longer true today.
We should welcome the increase in gender diversity and behavioral diversity among human beings because this is directly related to the increase in the scale of our minds, and we desperately need this complexity of states in our daily life so that we can more easily understand modern physics.
The problem will arise when states are no longer binary and move toward diversity and continuity. For example, in assessing that you are a happy man, it can no longer be said that yes, you are an “absolutely” happy man. Of course this is due to the pioneers of psychology for the development of describing different states in human behavior. It is better for our philosophers to learn a little from them.
In this case, you will have to measure your state relative to the resultant of community behavior. However, this relative state will not express your “absolute” state. In fact, by doing so, your existence in that group is defined, and consequently your relative behavior towards the known existence in that group is measured. So how can you know your absolute state?
You have to bear in mind that with the above practice, behavioral inference, you can only measure your appearance with the appearance of other people in a moment, or alternatively you can measure your behavior with the behavior of other people in a certain time frame. But you will not be able to do both at the same time because you are an observer with limited abilities. For example you do not have eyes behind to monitor both the people in front of you and the back.
But is there any other way to "absolutely" measure your physical and behavioral state?
Yes, your mother. She is probably the only person who has been aware of our state and location from the moment of birth until now. It is enough to ask her about your current state.
But what if we are the children of a bastard? What if our mother were a hooker and gave birth to us and then left us in a place and time that is unknown to us but known to her?
In this case, we need a zealous boy whose mind is full of questions and who packs his bag and goes on a miracle journey to find his mother. And you are that zealous boy who are packing to go and find the answers to the questions of other zealous girls and boys on earth who are waiting for answers.
You better understand what I was talking when I was discussing on the resultant of community behavior above. Like the resultant used for the unification between the special relativity and quantum physics. Yes, that's right. You are going to do everything!
What do you think of our mother? Is she still a hooker and hooking other males in the bar? Does her lustful hunger for young male still persist? How many of children, like us, has she left behind in the universe so far?
Maybe our mother is a noble lady, but we were the result of an unwanted pregnancy.
Nevertheless, if our mother is supposed to be a whore, then bring religious people with you to blame our mother. When they start blaming our mother, we will defend our mother with our knowledge, logic and wisdom, and we will be heroes for our mother.
Whatever our mother is, we will accept her realistically and hug her tightly.
Maybe she wants to introduce you to a hot girl; so when you go up there, don't forget to take a bouquet with you!
Oh sorry, I talk a lot. Before going for another milestone, coffee or tea? 😌☕
Image Source: https://jwst.nasa.gov/jwstArt/
Strawberry Moon 🍓or🌕 https://www.instagram.com/p/CQjiP5VrM3H/?utm_medium=tumblr
(1) “We think AU Mic b formed far from the star and migrated inward to its current orbit, something that can happen as planets interact gravitationally with a gas disk or with other planets,”
(2) “By contrast, Beta Pictoris b’s orbit doesn’t appear to have migrated much at all. The differences between these similarly aged systems can tell us a lot about how planets form and migrate.”
We may have a thought/problem as a star in our mind along with some ambiguous answers orbit around that thought/problem. But we often may not see progress in approaching those ambiguous answers to the core problem like Beta Pictoris system (2).
We may start thinking that the problem is at the core of our primitive thought/problem, and maybe that core is not very powerful. But I think the problem is the fear of creating chaos in our minds as AU Mic system (1) do. It is the planets and gas disk that bring AU Mic b closer to the star.
Maybe we better to act like AU Mic system when we think. We should not afraid of chaos around our primitive answers in order to tug them they come closer to the star!
Don't afraid of chaos and miss.
Image Source: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov
If one asks about the characteristics of the observer of these images in order to be able to compare them with the images that can be taken with the same observers and arrive at a unique interpretation of the components of these images, he is an scientist/expert.
If someone, by looking at these pictures, provides answers or views that make me start thinking and asking questions about those answers and views, he is a philosopher.
If anyone both asks questions about the characteristics of the observer and offers answers and views that I am just beginning to think about and ask questions about, she is Newton or Einstein.
If anyone is insists on seeking the creator of those stuff inside the pictures, he is a religious person.
Meanwhile, If I take a stand against the questions are asked or the answers are given, I am a fanatic.
Nevertheless, I did not take this photos, it was taken by those who were next to me. I was fascinated by watching this scene and that moment is called life.
✨Life is more beautiful than all those discussed above.✨
