Admire Yourself!
Admire yourself!
“The Crab Nebula sonification”
How do you admire yourself? How do you admire others?
Has there ever been a time when there was no noise in encouraging others? There is always a certain noise in admiration: even in the admiration we give ourselves. Do you ever remember when there was no sound and noise when you did a wonderful job admiring it?!
Now, if sound is an integral part of admiration and praise in us humans, it is less unlikely that you not look crazy to others when you are used to praising yourself or your abilities. All us may have heard this popular quotation: “They who dance are thought mad by those who hear not the music.”
Now, imagine such crazy people who want to relate the universe to themselves by saying that we are the universe and the universe is us. They will try to relate the universe to themselves, of which sound and noise will be an integral part. Perhaps the best part, because they are always admiring their abilities and work. To them, sound and noise will be an integral part of things that want to glorify their beauty, and mysteries, even if they do not have the right environment to convey it.
For some people, these sounds are merely for the emotional display of the glory and beauty of these phenomena, and for others, nothing glorious can be devoid of a certain noise if they are to be related with us and admire themselves like us. Views are always different!
How can something be related to us and not use some kind of noise to praise itself?!
Have you ever tried to admire yourself without any noise?! The thought of such an endeavor may lead you to not seem insane to others which is insane in itself!
Even when I want to act logically, the noise of music affects my thoughts. Because it is less likely that the mind can praise itself without a certain noise. Listening to music reminds us of those sounds that our mind uses for its own praise, and it has always been impossible for me to ignore them.
Can you imagine a God who has no voice? Such a noiseless God never praise himself; what a helpless and weak God who has nothing in itself to admire!
When was the last time you heared or used a certain noise like crazy people?!
Video source:
https://www.nasa.gov/content/explore-from-space-to-sound
More Posts from Ehsunassadi and Others
TOURNAMENT EARTH 2021
Vote at https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/tournament-earth
Let's guess which images others are going to take to the final stage.
Although there are definitely many parameters, such games have always been enjoyable for me. So let's have a try.
In the image below, those images that are connected in a straight line are my choices for the final stage.
However, people are not going to have them as their choice.
I have considered some imaginary behavioral filters and are going to anticipate that whcih images will be chosen based on those filters.
F1: Entertainment filter. For example, The image of a racetrack from astronauts' perspective is likely to be more appealing to people.
F2: Chaos and excitement filter. One of the strangest traits of most people is that they escape chaos in their lives but enjoy seeing a chaotic phenomenon when they and their fellows are in a comfort zone!
F3: Tendency to artificiality. People like artificial things more than facts.
F4: Tendency to colorful life without engaging to details.
F5: Hope for strange events.
F6: Passion for power even it was destructive!
F7: Eagerness for bold things.
F8: They believe that life is more beautiful than what they encountered in their daily life!
F9: Quality filter. It depends on the screen they vote on. If we considered most of them will vote on Mobile screen then they may act like what I chosed above.
F10: Passion for mysterious and unkown things because they think that some unkowns have not yet revealed in them.
It was snowing and our yard seemed to belong to another planet today. It was the first time that my cat was seeing the snow. Curious, frightened, she went down the stairs and stood at the bottom of the stairs and stared at the snow for some time. She started curling around the snow for a full circle, then stopped again and stared at the snow in fear. Then she scratched a piece of snow with her paw and pulled it over to smell it. Maybe she was seeking for some familiar smell, which was obvious from his appearance that it was not so! She stood there for a few minutes. When she understand that there was nothing left for her to be more curious about this bizarre surface, she stepped into the snow and reached the other dry side. She sat there and watched my father shoveling the snow. When she got enough of it, came home right from the middle of the snow and started licking himself as usual!
I was wondering why something that is normal for us--walking in the snow--should be so impressive to me that I want to write something about it.
In fact, the reason for the cat's action was her thoughtful and deliberately planned action rather than a simple curiosity. If the cat rudely entered the snow, her action would be funny to me than effective and inspiring.
It seems that any courageous action that is done precisely and thoughtfully, however time consuming and tedious, will definitely be effective and inspiring for others.
My father shoveled all the snow and there are no cat footprints left for me to take and share a photo for you, but here is the real story of our cat!
We All Are Idiots!
"I see a canoid patch of colour"
Such images evoke the "primary language" in me which belongs to a lower level of language hierarchy.
like Images, the existence of a hierarchy in language is essential because we have to live in a society made up of people with different backgrounds and desires, idiots are also included!
High-level language is necessary to deal with the idiots of society, and also we have to construct " the language" instead of "a language". never, the higher the level of language in "the language" hierarchy, the farther we are from having a unique interpretation about the facts.
The primary language confined to matters belonging to the biography of the interpreter without engaging any element of inference in order to become "all" observers rather than "some" observers. So primary language a lower level of language hierarchy is more appropriate to describe such images, though we may seem idiot this time!
"I see a canoid patch of colour"
Strawberry Moon 🍓or🌕 https://www.instagram.com/p/CQjiP5VrM3H/?utm_medium=tumblr
If one asks about the characteristics of the observer of these images in order to be able to compare them with the images that can be taken with the same observers and arrive at a unique interpretation of the components of these images, he is an scientist/expert.
If someone, by looking at these pictures, provides answers or views that make me start thinking and asking questions about those answers and views, he is a philosopher.
If anyone both asks questions about the characteristics of the observer and offers answers and views that I am just beginning to think about and ask questions about, she is Newton or Einstein.
If anyone is insists on seeking the creator of those stuff inside the pictures, he is a religious person.
Meanwhile, If I take a stand against the questions are asked or the answers are given, I am a fanatic.
Nevertheless, I did not take this photos, it was taken by those who were next to me. I was fascinated by watching this scene and that moment is called life.
✨Life is more beautiful than all those discussed above.✨
(1) “We think AU Mic b formed far from the star and migrated inward to its current orbit, something that can happen as planets interact gravitationally with a gas disk or with other planets,”
(2) “By contrast, Beta Pictoris b’s orbit doesn’t appear to have migrated much at all. The differences between these similarly aged systems can tell us a lot about how planets form and migrate.”
We may have a thought/problem as a star in our mind along with some ambiguous answers orbit around that thought/problem. But we often may not see progress in approaching those ambiguous answers to the core problem like Beta Pictoris system (2).
We may start thinking that the problem is at the core of our primitive thought/problem, and maybe that core is not very powerful. But I think the problem is the fear of creating chaos in our minds as AU Mic system (1) do. It is the planets and gas disk that bring AU Mic b closer to the star.
Maybe we better to act like AU Mic system when we think. We should not afraid of chaos around our primitive answers in order to tug them they come closer to the star!
Don't afraid of chaos and miss.
Image Source: https://exoplanets.nasa.gov
It is easy when the argument is that you are single or in a relationship because it is a binary state (single or in a relationship). You do not even need to be judged by others because you will choose one of these two options. This was true for gender in the past, but it is no longer true today.
We should welcome the increase in gender diversity and behavioral diversity among human beings because this is directly related to the increase in the scale of our minds, and we desperately need this complexity of states in our daily life so that we can more easily understand modern physics.
The problem will arise when states are no longer binary and move toward diversity and continuity. For example, in assessing that you are a happy man, it can no longer be said that yes, you are an “absolutely” happy man. Of course this is due to the pioneers of psychology for the development of describing different states in human behavior. It is better for our philosophers to learn a little from them.
In this case, you will have to measure your state relative to the resultant of community behavior. However, this relative state will not express your “absolute” state. In fact, by doing so, your existence in that group is defined, and consequently your relative behavior towards the known existence in that group is measured. So how can you know your absolute state?
You have to bear in mind that with the above practice, behavioral inference, you can only measure your appearance with the appearance of other people in a moment, or alternatively you can measure your behavior with the behavior of other people in a certain time frame. But you will not be able to do both at the same time because you are an observer with limited abilities. For example you do not have eyes behind to monitor both the people in front of you and the back.
But is there any other way to "absolutely" measure your physical and behavioral state?
Yes, your mother. She is probably the only person who has been aware of our state and location from the moment of birth until now. It is enough to ask her about your current state.
But what if we are the children of a bastard? What if our mother were a hooker and gave birth to us and then left us in a place and time that is unknown to us but known to her?
In this case, we need a zealous boy whose mind is full of questions and who packs his bag and goes on a miracle journey to find his mother. And you are that zealous boy who are packing to go and find the answers to the questions of other zealous girls and boys on earth who are waiting for answers.
You better understand what I was talking when I was discussing on the resultant of community behavior above. Like the resultant used for the unification between the special relativity and quantum physics. Yes, that's right. You are going to do everything!
What do you think of our mother? Is she still a hooker and hooking other males in the bar? Does her lustful hunger for young male still persist? How many of children, like us, has she left behind in the universe so far?
Maybe our mother is a noble lady, but we were the result of an unwanted pregnancy.
Nevertheless, if our mother is supposed to be a whore, then bring religious people with you to blame our mother. When they start blaming our mother, we will defend our mother with our knowledge, logic and wisdom, and we will be heroes for our mother.
Whatever our mother is, we will accept her realistically and hug her tightly.
Maybe she wants to introduce you to a hot girl; so when you go up there, don't forget to take a bouquet with you!
Oh sorry, I talk a lot. Before going for another milestone, coffee or tea? 😌☕
Image Source: https://jwst.nasa.gov/jwstArt/
A Flawed Ingenuity!
If you want to use ingenuity to refer indiscriminately to all human mental activity, as Descartes, in order to inspire a whole generation, your achievements or characteristic should not be flawless! Otherwise, you will not be able to inspire next generations and lead them to next level.
"Hence memory is the same as imagination […], and imagination is likewise taken for ingenuity or invention,”.
Human ingenuity is "sharp," "acute," or "penetrating", which is able to understand relations.
If we want to act non-discriminative in order to inspire next generations, we must accept that we are the product of an evolution and we are still very young in the process! Hence, our imagination must be yet smooth rather than sharp. Therefore, how we can refer genius to an achievement or someone of our own kind if that thing can be free of flaws and error over time!
I may like to refer geniuses to those great minds who either imperfectly answered the big questions or asked big questions that the questions themselves had a flaw with. Because, those errors and flaws inspire next generations to improve on their great achievements, and consequently, lead to next level of evolution.
However, a big question arises that what is the role of perseverance here?
Finally, how I could be honest with what I wrote in this post if my memory helped me to remember which great minds used those terms, shown inside “ ”, in order to refer to them on this post!
Energy is going to be scaled!
By this move, the cat wants to teach us to consider energy consumption as both relative and scaled. 😁🤫😴
Perseverance has collected its first scientifically-selected sample.
----------------------------------------
A mother calls her child that she recently gives birth to as her "first" child because she hopes for two things;
The first latent hope is that she can give birth to another one, the second is that the child can also be a creator like the mother in the future.
Without such hopes, the child will be the last child of the mother, or better to say that her "first" and "last" child at the same time. Without such hopes, she can "certainly" not call the child her "first" child.
Hope is the latent reason for certainty, ordering, indexing, and knowledge of states. It allows us to have some inferences and interpretations about our observations such that those inferences play as imaginary observations.
When we claim to have collected the "first" sample from the Mars, there are probably two hopes behind this claim;
First, we hope that the "second" sample will be collected in the future, or we hope that this is the only existing sample that will return to Earth and after comparing to our previous knowledge an ordinal number like "first" can be applied to it.
We humans had difficult times to survive, and, consequently, hope was necessary to human beings to overcome such difficulties over time. It has become an integral part of our temperament and identity, and has increased our desire for certainty than uncertainty.
Hope is the reason that we humans mostly tend to certainty than duality and uncertainty. It leads to "certainty", so sometimes it can be the most deceptive thing in the world, specially for single and first observations and collections.
Although human beings strive to replace sustainability in technology with hope, this does not affect the generality of our discussion. Sustainability in technology only guarantees certainty of an event in the future while we discuss the moment that sample collected. It is obvious that everything is certain in the future!
Overall, we may not be allowed to call it first or even zeroth sample yet.
Sometime we may send a hopeless but happy mother to Mars.
"One is always wrong, but with two truth begins. One cannot prove the case, but two is irrefutable." _ Friedrich Nietzsche
Image source: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-perseverance-rover-successfully-cores-its-first-rock
