Yet Another Reason Why Queer Romance In Media That Is Very Subtle Or More Queer-coding Than Actual Explicit

yet another reason why queer romance in media that is very subtle or more queer-coding than actual explicit rep is so much more compelling than the wealth of straight stories that are out there is bc I think a lot of romance writers forget that you have to like. show not tell. and imply things. and if you hustle things along and put two characters together for the sake of it instead of really working to build their relationship and show how well they work with each other it's not really going to be as interesting to people. and for some reason, a staggering amount of people do not know how to write romance properly so you get a very bland forced dynamic that either feels like an afterthought (he's a boy and she's a girl, hey they could be together because that's what happens!) or the only thing that matters about their characters (see her? she's the Love Interest. that is all she's there for)

however if you're being censored and you literally can't make your characters say "I love you" or kiss or maybe even hold hands you're going to have to come up with more creative ways to tell your audience that they're in love and that usually results in the most poetic beautiful stuff you've ever seen that's SO much more interesting than two characters who make eye contact and go into the slow-mo rose petals scene that's basically screaming at you "hey look at these two. they're in love. you're supposed to be invested in their relationship now. do you get it?" eye contact held for slightly too long in an emotional scene is more compelling. a hand very lightly touching their back is WAY more compelling.

and might I add this is not even impossible to achieve with uncensored straight romances at all like Pride & Prejudice is wildly popular for this exact reason. how many times have I seen people going insane over the hand flex scene. they didn't even kiss in that movie unless you count the extended ending. and everyone loves it. because it's done RIGHT.

tldr; romance is hard to write and you have to put in the effort if you want people to care about your ship. now go forth and imply something

QUICK EDIT TO ADD ALSO when things are more subtle that gives people more space to interpret the dynamic as whatever they want. something might be subtle because that's all they're allowed to show, but something might be subtle because that literally what it's supposed to be. as an aroace person I personally see a LOT of queerplatonic vibes from more subtly played relationships and it's so incredibly exciting and heartwarming for me. and that's a whole new realm of relationship that I think should also be given more attention

More Posts from Psrinklers and Others

psrinklers

4 weeks ago

This Is Your Canon Reminder For The Day That Dick Is A Nerdy Li’l Shakespeare Buff.

This is your canon reminder for the day that Dick is a nerdy li’l Shakespeare buff. <3

Scans from Batman #216 (1969), Gotham Knights #42 (2003), Teen Titans #36 (1971), and Batman #682 (2009).

1K notes View Post

psrinklers

1 week ago

being doomed by the narrative is cool and all but i like when a character is doomed just by being a fucking idiot. sorry that happened to you but it is entirely your own fault and you could have just chosen to not do all that

Tags

odysseus greek mythology achilles theseus paris of troy

10K notes View Post

psrinklers

1 week ago

"I asked Grok" "I asked ChatGPT" I asked the Oracle and it told me you're going to kill your father and marry your mom

50 notes View Post

psrinklers

1 week ago

the birthday is birthdaying today, most of the problems i’ve been stressing about for at least the past month have been resolved 🙏🙏🙏

1 note View Post

psrinklers

3 weeks ago

jason todd would love lady macbeth

Tags

jason todd not in the way that he is her but her facade of being completely evil only to be the one to succumb to guilt she’s only defined by her husband and does everything for him how she simultaneously holds the most power and none at all she dies and macbeth selfishly says she should have died hereafter jason would hateee macbeth would jason question if he’s like lady macbeth? is he haunted by guilt despite the necessity of his actions or would he feel bad that he isn’t?

10 notes View Post

psrinklers

3 weeks ago

“Jason requires an extreme act of devotion from Bruce because he thinks he’s unloved” WRONG. JASON IS LOVED AND HE KNOWS THAT.

Jason KNOWS Bruce loves him, that’s why he forgave him. You do not pluck a child from destruction and ruin because you don’t love them. You do not foster and nurture and support and raise him when you don’t love him. You do not mourn what you don’t love.

Jason knows he’s loved. He just doesn’t think he’s loved ENOUGH.

And he loves Bruce back. You can feel it reverberate and whisper in every single action, in every pulse of his vein. He loved Bruce so much it took DEATH to separate them.

But you can’t load a gun with love.

2K notes View Post

psrinklers

3 weeks ago

The body of a post is where Hamlet talks to Claudius. The tags is where Hamlet talks to the audience

2K notes View Post

psrinklers

1 week ago

Considering every attempt at bringing Jason Todd back as a villain (Dixon’s AU attempt in ‘96, Loeb’s Hush attempt in ‘03, + Winick’s successful UTH attempt in ‘04-5) was predicated on retconning Jaybin into someone that he wasn’t, I actually don’t think you can remove Red Hood from the discussion of how DC write Jason as a child. You can prefer one over the other if you want, but Red Hood + all his problems only exist because DC needed to villainise Jason Todd somewhere along his character history to prove that Jaybin’s death was a net positive.

The second Robin receiving an embryonic Red Hood-ification in Cheer, Robin Lives + apparently Lemire’s Robin + Batman was the whole point of Jason coming back as a Bad Guy to begin with. And at a stroke, it returns us to Marv Wolfman + Dixon’s classist victim-blaming narrative. And to their intended goal — to blatantly overwrite Jason Todd’s actual character with stereotypes to preserve the Batman + Robin power fantasy.

118 notes View Post

psrinklers

1 week ago

there’s a certain number of “bad writers” after which you just have to accept that yeahh that character is just like that now, it doesn’t mean you can’t disregard recent works but it’s canon that sucks, not a certain work or two

Tags

i really want 80s jaybin back but yeahhh it’s probably not going to happen or at least not consistently nothing is stopping me from being salty about it though this post is mostly about batman tbh

1 note View Post

psrinklers

2 weeks ago

the day that people stop simplifying jason’s ideologies to the death penalty and punitive justice is the day i find peace

Tags

jason todd unlike someone. he wanted the joker dead because of how many people he killed NOT because of how supposedly iredeemable he is and individual murder does not mean supporting the death penalty he’s literally against the police this is not consistent with some of his depictions but i choose to ignore them because they make no sense jaybin would never so neither would red hood

152 notes View Post