Context: me and some friends are playing pen and paper fallout, basically if dnd and fallout had a baby. This game has a bunch of d100 rolls where a high roll is actually very bad. We were raiding a super mutant camp and one bad roll led to another…
DM: the mutant is charging forward at you, you can roll to attack.
Friend 1: I take out my Magnum and…
DM: what?
Friend 1: uh…
Me: oh shit he got a bad roll. Calling it right now.
Friend 1: just promise me you won’t do anything dumb with this.
Friend 2: SHOOT HIM IN THE DICK
Friend 1: …I got an 89
DM: upon pulling your gun out, you fire too early, and shoot yourself in the dick. Roll for damage
Friend 1: God damn it man. *rolls a d6* I got a 1
DM: you end up circumcised by the bullet.
Friend 1: THAT’S NOT HOW THAT BULLSHIT WORKS
Friend 2 and the DM just die laughing as friend 1 is arguing about getting circumcised.
This would happen less often if there were drastic public consequences that were life changing.
#SayHerName
#SayHerName
#SayHerName
#SayHerName
#SayHerName
i’m so sick of news articles that look like this
it builds itself up like OKAY WE FOUND THESE DEVASTATING RESULTS
and then you go in to look and you find it had a sample size of 40
and then you’re like okay, what was the fantastic difference between these 40 people when sleeping with and without a dog
and the article is like
…so you get through it and you’re like you’re trying to tell me you think this is substantial in any capacity, this 40 sample size 3% difference ass bullshit??????????? you fucking shitforbrick bad at math fake ass science losers?
Hilarious animals in clumsy situations
Six-String Samurai