Can we talk about how it’s more and more canon that Bellamy is Clarke’s weakness?
4x03 is a dare for 2x09 on its own. Cause here we have Clarke, trying to decide who among 500 people deserves to live and die, and all she knows is that Bellamy is on that list before she even makes it. She doesn’t need Bellamy to go out there and sacrifice himself for the good of their people (2x09), she does the EXACT opposite. She knows she’ll be sacrificing someone for him
And let me tell you, this is EXACTLY what she was scared of on 2x09. One of the reasons why Clarke was so ready to buy Lxa’s “love is weakness” hocus pocus is that she told Clarke that loving someone would end up crowding her judgement and making her put the people she cares about in danger…. oh would you look at that.
(looking at you 4x03, 4x04, 4x05 ….)
Clarke’s love for Bellamy has always been something that COULD make Clarke- the head, the rational, the girl who would sacrifice everything and everyone for the ‘greater good’- decide to chooser her heart over anything else. And that is what makes it different from any of her feelings for anyone else.
And i know what some people might be thinking. That Clarke put Bellamy’s name right there on the list because he had some ~practical reason to be there. Please, now we must return again to the “why Bellamy is the number 99 on the list and not number 1″ discourse. For starters, YES, Bellamy IS NUMBER ONE. Before that llist was even a list, Clarke decided bellamy’s name was on it - and that’s the first canon name we knew was on the list. So yeah, rewatch 4x03 if you must, Bellamy is number one.
But why, why that when it came to write it, Bellamy came out as 99?
If Bellamy really had a strong trait that would officially put him on the list don’t you think he’d be first? don’t you think he’d be at least near Raven’s name? (who was like number 3 or 4). We see the list, the names go : Abby (number one, proudly), idk Jaha, Raven etc. The natural progression here would have been to but Bellamy’s name after them. If Clarke was to say they need Bellamy to survive, if Clarke was to say they need Bellamy for a strong leadership (as Jaha suggested).
But, no. Bellamy is 99. The number 1 name on her list ends up as 99. And i don’t know about you, but the only logical explanation for such thing is that Bellamy didn’t (in Clarke’s 4x04 super rational classification, not int he show’s) have an 100% rational reason to be there. So, yes, Clarke “sacrificed” her head chosen someone to put Bellamy on the list.
(Let that sink in)
Enters 4x05.
Do we even want to go there?
I find 4x05 harder to analyze- which was probably the writers goal anyway - because there’s no way we can know how many people would Roan attack if Clarke didn’t cave in. We don’t know how many sky people were there to fight with the Azgeda army.
However, i don’t think that even matters in the end. Sometimes, when we analyze a text, all you gotta do is see the writers’ intent instead of pinpointing a character’s feeling.
And this is what we got: Roan threatens Bellamy’s (and Kane’s…..) life if Clarke doesn’t let him use the ark for his people. Clarke is obviously shaken by that, then she proceeds to threaten him back saying she’d sacrifice her own mother for ‘the greater good’.
(making an obvious callback to an episode everyone remember like the back of our darn hands, “start with Bellamy Blake”s echo on the walls of the cave Clarke and Echo they were in-)
And then……… and then when Roan doesn’t cave, Clarke does.
Clarke who just said she’d stop at nothing, will sacrifice 50 of her people over this.
Again, we go back to the beginning (and to 3x15 old analysis), since we don’t have enough information we can’t make the “Clarke would sacrifice Abby but she wouldn’t sacrifice Bellamy” conclusion. 3x15 and 4x05 are two different situations, we don’t know how many people war would kill if Clarke hadn’t caved.
But what we do know, in spite of anything, is that the writers hammered in our hands throughout the episode how Clarke was worried about Bellamy ( first scene with monty, again when monty tells her bellamy is missing at the meeting, when Bellamy is revealed to have been taken hostage). They don’t show any of this concern for Kane (sorry bro).
They show us Roan saying they have hostages, the camera going at Bellamy, then Roan using the “hostages” (ahemBellamyahem) as leverage. The they proceed to remind us of the “start with Bellamy Blake” episode by reminding us of how Clarke is able to sacrifice anything for ‘the greater good’.
So, we don’t need a Abby/Bellamy parallel here, we don’t need to know if Clarke had a rational reason for caving in (such as more than 50 people would die or Kane or whatever. If they didn’t show us ,the writers didn’t want us to think about that even if this can be claimed in the future); what we do know is that Clarke can sacrifice anything and anyone for the greater good, but not Bellamy Blake.
50 of her people went out of her list, just like that.
Tell me again how Bellamy was not #1 on it?
Yessss
PLEASE BEWARE THE BLOOD OF OLYMPUS SPOILERS BEYOND:
Read More
Okay, final verdict:
John Ambrose > Peter Kavinsky
BUT
Lara Jean + Peter Kavinsky > Lara Jean + John Ambrose
Yasssss
5 years; 10 books; 100s of deaths; 100s of friends; hours of sleep, lost; a river of tears shed; An Armada of ships (some more of dingys that had started to flood); Millions of feelings shouted at the pages. And its finally over. My life….. is officially over. Percy Jackson, Annabeth...
Whoo
Heroes of Olympus | Coke Bottles
omg, i s2g i figured riverdale’s mystery out
to summarize (sorry for repetition from other post but i wanted everything in one post):
1. everyone keeps pointing out how similar archie and jason looked and were. they had more in common than sports; they were both tutored by ms grundy (pause for vom), they were both at the river. they both had red hair. archie was the intended target, and the killer is grundy’s husband.
why? like i’ve said, i hated that plot to high hell but grundy did seem to be really genuinely afraid of him (assuming that was the truth), afraid that he’d do something terrible to her. if it was the truth and that’s why she changed her identity, then ostensibly he’s real dangerous.
2. plot wise, also like i’ve said, it would rly teach archie a lesson in consequences and shake up his naivety, but it also makes sense because the only other people with motives to torture a kid for a week seemed to acquit themselves in the recent episode
polly has an alibi, the coopers genuinely seem like they didn’t do it (plus it’d be way too obvious), and the blossoms wouldn’t torture jason
3. we’re halfway through the season; if we haven’t met the killer yet i’d be surprised. if i’ve learned anything by doing meta and theories is how to structure pacing. the killer has to strike again, and it has to be someone we’ve seen; someone who’s a recurring character. all of the main characters seem innocent.
so back to my first point, who’s the only lone character with those connections to grundy and archie, re: music?
professor oscar castillo.
4. remember in 1x05 where he stiffened at the name “grundy” ? he said “the music teacher who left?” remember when he turned away and said something weird about the connection she clearly had with archie? how he clearly hated archie on sight? he’s grundy’s husband.
the actor has been booked for a recurring role [x], and i’ll bet he was at the river that day, he thought jason was archie, but after he’d realized it wasn’t archie he couldn’t let jason leave. so he tortured him for information on grundy and archie and eventually shot jason, but now has to wait for the right time to strike again.
it’s him. he did it. i’ll put money on it.
I know a lot of us wanted THIS SEASON to be the one where Bellamy finds out about the radio calls and spends the entire season pining after Clarke while not sure what to do about Echo… I think we’ve been set up to do that next season.
And by doing this they’ve made the stakes a lot higher.
Before it would have been just an immediate regression to what had happened 6 years before praimfire 2.0 - and would have made the separation and the six year gap entirely pointless.
Now we’ve had at least some time for them to hit the ground, reacquaint themselves to each other, and be shocked by how much is different and yet how much is the same.
It’s also given the audience more time to accept the new and important relationships in Clarke and Bellamy’s lives.
Although it removes the momentum that had gathered by the end of season 4, I think it will make what comes next all the more rewarding by how hard we will see Clarke and Bellamy fight for it.
Yasss
Latch
Same age as Bianca!!!
Luke was 22 when he died. Clarisse is now 19 as she is 2 years older than Percy. Annabeth’s 18. Octavian was 18. Percy’s 17, and as they were in the same grade, so is Rachel. Beckendorf was at least 17 when he died. Drew is probably either 16 or 17 as she was younger than Silena but older...
reblog if you agree
Yes yes yes!
Percy Jackson’s Greek Heroes »> "I’ve had some bad experiences in my time, but the heroes I’m going to tell you about were the original old school hard luck cases. They boldly screwed up where no one had screwed up before…"