Objectified - Blog Posts

EEEEEHEHHEHEHEHHEHEHEHHEHEHEHHEHE-

I AM EATING THIS AGGRESSIVELY BROHAMM

Did an art trade with my bud, @lil-bobcatz !! Here's my piece! :D

ALSO while I'm here. Give me objectified drawing requests please and thank you. I'll take ocs or canons

Drawing au nickel is like my new favorite thing

New Lamented Lunacy chapter tomorrow (probably)

Can't

Escape

My

Fate

Yes. Yes I am🤪

What soul?

Well, the whole question got me thinking, someone with a mild interest in the general sciences and I thought, why not let them be another elementary particle?

Now, it is kind of clear that with the whole "RGB" thing the subatomic particle physics of the entire objectified universe is probably very very different, but with how similar a lot of things are I assume that atoms and chemicals are relatively unchanged.

So, souls could be disturbances in yet another particle field! It makes sense how they could then interact with the world and move from A to B and be influenced by other living beings.

Of course, you can very easily come up with some metaphysical explanation, but I'm not really into that, so here I am.

I call the field that contains the soul the etherfield. And the particles that inhabit this field are the etherons. Which then could in turn create antietherons, which could be fun: beings with anti-souls...

Anyways, I'm getting off-track.

How eat?

What if you could use these etherons in biological processes? Maybe this is how soul-consuming beings make their energy? I think it'd be cool if they were effected by electric charges.

Maybe you could have them boxed in little molecules for transport. It'd be kind of interesting. Here's an approximate idea of what one might look like? Treating them like electrons, a heavily fluorinated cubane structure could work. An interesting consequence of this is that fluorine would be promoted to an essential element for soul-consuming species (eating toothpaste for sustinence, anyone?).

With the right properties given to an etheron, perhaps it could be more efficient than oxidative phosphorylation?

Again, this is just a very general idea, the molecules in use and the exact methods would probably end up very different. Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

fixed this because sighhh i live her sighs in love hearts for eyes

augh 😔❤️